OR, maybe he didn’t do it? It will be interesting to see if the D can prove he wasn’t at the bridge after 1:30 pm. I can’t wait to see if the P can prove that he was there AFTER 1:30 pm, without a doubt. We don’t know do we, and yet, so many have him convicted already. SMH.
That's the one I'm reading!
I mean, we certainly don’t know what we don’t know but if the D could prove for sure where RA was after 1:30 would he still be in prison? Would they not be screaming from the rooftops if they had anything to show couldn’t have been him? Eg: with RL, he had his cousin lie for him, but a reciept said he was at a store or something? ETA - edited bc I don’t recall all the details and don’t want to confuse anyone!
What are your thoughts so far?
Your list of questions brings up MY biggest question - where is the cell phone data from RAs phone? There doesn’t seem to be mention of it anywhere from the state and I have a hard time believing that they wouldn’t have collected this ?
The State is respecting the gag order. Maybe we'll hear about all sorts of things at the pretrial hearings starting July 30th?
Bumbling. Someone misfiled the tip and RA was hiding in plain sight and didn't stand out. The main investigators didn't knew about RA until 2022 probably. If they didn't misfiled the tip, the case have been solved in the first week after the crime. It would have been easier for the police and the prosecution as there would probably have been more evidence and he wouldn't have had time to get rid of the evidence and we wouldn't have had as many conspiracy theories like now. At the end, the investigation made many mistakes but they managed to find the right guy IMO.
Yes, if it's true, as they imply in their motions, that there is 'no' real evidence against RA, and the bullet has no valid chain of custody, and all the confessions are phoney and meaningless, then why not just go to trial as soon as possible?Why would Judge Gull recuse herself? She's done nothing to recuse herself for according to the SCOIN. The D is mad because she's mean to them, hurts their fee fees and doesn't jokingly call them ding dongs too.
The PCA and SW aren't going anywhere no matter how hard the D tries to spin it. Why not just get their completely innocent client to Court and prove it as soon as possible??? Should be easy to do based on what they've reported around the gag order.
JMO
I think mrjitty was joking. The DT did say at one time that JG was going to have to be a witness, which didn't really make any sense, but...?
That incident did not prove any one lied. There is no reason for her to take the witness stand. That was wishful thinking on their part. IMO
Early on in the investigation when B McD was still a credible journalist, LE did share some things with her. They were still investigating and trying to find the murderer.This is what I meant by “friend of the state”.IMO BM seemingly found the right connection early on in law enforcement to obtain inside information. MOO
In Camera Hearing Transcript.pdf | PDF Host
PDF Host read free online - In Camera Hearing Transcript.pdfpdfhost.io
View attachment 519548
The Defense's impression or understand of SC's statement. IMOThe “muddy or muddy/bloody” argument can be found in the FM pg. 117
DELPHI: Memorandum in Support of Motion PDF | PDF | Prosecutor | Police
DELPHI: Memorandum in Support of Motion.pdfwww.scribd.com
To me it means Judge Gull read the pertinent information around the ballistic testing of the unspent bullet done by a qualified professional at the ISP lab and found it credible to be heard in Court. Even the examiner stated that it is subjective science but it is allowed in Indiana Courts.
Since the Defense hasn't offered up any alibi information for RA, we won't know the answers to these questions until trial. I find that very odd that they haven't, unless of course RA doesn't have one.
