If he thinks he recorded it, why can't he find the recording? https://www.scribd.com/document/672126677/DELPHI-Memorandum-in-Support-of-Motion-pdf
Wondering if we know: did the girls see him walk UP to the bridge / bench or? Did they see him ARRIVE (park? walk toward the bridge? Where were they when they spotted BG?). How are they certain he didn't leave right after they spotted BG?
That's a bit of a big error though no matter how we look at it imo. It just seems to me that if an LE (or someone from an agency assisting LE) interviews someone who says they were at the trail that day, that this person would then contact his supervisor or LE directly and speak to whomever is in charge as soon as they found out they had just talked to a guy who was there! Especially if he was there at a time so relevant to the case - even if they LE didn't know what time the kids were taken at that point. How did this information get lost for so many years? If I were DD I'd be calling LE to say hey guys - I met with some guy around the time when the murders happened, I can't remember his name but he was there.... I'd like to know - did he do this? If not, why not? If so, when?
I wonder if he perhaps didn't freak out the way we imagine he may because it doesn't seem that anyone called to give LE his name or anything else that would help lead LE to him around the time when that video was released. If someone had done so, surely they'd have made this arrest years sooner, no? Moooo.
"known" is the keyword for me in your post. LE can't account for people they do not know to have been there. We'd like to think they rounded up everyone who was there, and that RA is the right man, but there is the chance that actually, someone else *was* there that no one seems to know about and it could be RA or it could be someone else entirely. We don't really know yet. We know that the police and State have a theory as to what happened that day, and there is probably something really damning in what was found with the Search Warrant at RA's home because the D is very much opposed to it staying as evidence.... but still don't know a whole lot really.
I think it was obvious that I meant to the court in the subsequent response filing.
Guess we'll have to wait for testimony to find out.Oh my gosh I didn’t know that the FBI clerical error story was from the freakin Murder Sheet and not from the LE?
“Áine Cain and Kevin Greenlee, creators of the The Murder Sheet podcast, told The Independent on Thursday that a civilian FBI employee mislabeled or misfiled information about Mr Allen when he was interviewed by police not long after the murders of Libby German and Abby Williams in Delphi, Indiana.”
Delphi murders suspect slipped through net in 2017 due to ‘clerical error’
EXCLUSIVE: An affidavit released this week revealed that Richard Allen had actually been on the radar of law enforcement at the time of the murders and told police that he was at the scene of the murders in 2017www.independent.co.uk
This is the FBIs response:
“The statement says:
As stated in the past this is a complex multi-agency investigation. The implication that an alleged clerical error by an FBI employee caused years of delay in identifying this defendant is misleading. Our review of the matter shows FBI employees correctly followed established procedures.”
Responding to "Clerical Error" Claims
INDIANAPOLIS — Some have been saying it was a “clerical error,” and now the FBI is responding. You might have heard reports that tracking down a suspect in the Delphi case was delayed due to a “clerical error.” FBI Indianapolis issued a response to those claims Thursday. The statement says: As...wibc.com
It could be a case of his everyday phone having a digital black hole for the abuduction/murders time frame and maybe there's evidence of a burner phone at the scene not identified. Either of those would be very suspicious as RA said he was watching his stock ticker on his phone while walking the trail. MO
Why would you think DD was not telling the truth, just curious?
A person that feels the need to carry a gun for protection during their afternoon hike on a trail walked by single women and teenage girls would obviously want to carry a phone to call for help.
He said he was unsure if it was recorded, 6 years later. At the time in 2017 all he's doing is interviewing a local CVS guy who told him about more potential witnesses, which he noted to look into. His job was to do the interview, write a report. With the flood of tips coming in generating mounds of reports, I find one of them being missfiled not very extraordinary. Richard Allen having a first name for his last name too probably was the root cause of the error in filing. AJMO
The group of girls were leaving, he was arriving (time stamped by a photo image from a witness). RA's words put him on the trail watching his stock ticker, then on the first platform of the bridge (time stamped by Harvest Store video) Witness BB saw RA on the first platform right before leaving and immediately seeing Abby and Libby approaching the bridge.This has all been discussed over and over. Can't wait to hear the actual testimony from the witnesses themselves. MO
This is what I’m wondering ! Where is the cell phone data!?
Yes well-rounded individuals, we can only hope.
RA said he had his cell phone on the trail and was using it on the trail. Then he gave his cell phone information to DD just days later. If that doesn't show up as being on the trail, that's a big problem for RA, IMO It being there during the original time frame RA told DD he was there would also be a big problem for RA, IMO.
I'm confused by your question about where his cell phone data is?
Several reasons, IMHO
