You want the state to pay the defense lawyers hourly fee for an entire day for one of the lead lawyers to drive out to the prison (what was it eight hours, round trip?) to drop off discovery because the prison cannot be trusted to follow their own protocols surrounding inmate legal documents ?
There is no way IMO, that there isn't an estimated TOD by the ME. Just because we haven't seen it, doesn't mean it does not exist.
I would say they got it from the reports from crime scene techs based on the testimony today.Everyone has their own little quirk of a case they get fixated on (who fed those McStay dogs)
For me on this case, it's the darned footnote in the Franks about the rope that the defence claimed might have been used to hang the victim by her feet.
I always knew that was wild speculation, because her hair would be full of blood and there would be ligature marks around her ankles.
But now we know from yesterdays reporting that the defence always knew that was an outright fabrication ... and put it in there anyway.
Where did they get the idea? My guess is 'trusted consultant' MW's mining of social media.
IMO
A life stressor and just plain evil also explains it. I don't believe RA had a psychotic break, I think he was angry and mad and Libby and Abby were his targets.
I don’t see any way that Judge Gull would allow any of the defence lawyers to stand up in her courtroom and lie to her face about the medical examiner and the autopsy report does not indicate any time of death. There’s no way that Judge Gull would allow this without swift punishment.
If KA and RA's mother didn't believe him and his confession/s until today, but RA's daughter doesn't support him, there must be a insuperable conflict between the parties meanwhile. IMO Hard for a little family of three relatives.
I also consider the Odinist sacrifice of Abby & Libby magical thinking and I am not condescending or making fun. It's just that illogical and non sensical to me.I think that once you read the transcripts, you will see the hours of important testimony and overwhelming details that are scrubbed from this broadcast. They are staunch anti-defense. They don’t share any detail of testimony of defense witnesses. They support one biased narrative and intentionally do not include content that supports theories outside of their own.
If you listened tonight, you would be very aware of their mocking coverage of the expert. Did you hear anything she said about the crime scene or her history other than Aine condescendingly making fun of “magical thinking” because Aine doesn’t comprehend the subject matter ? If you don’t understand the testimony being given as a “reporter” wouldn’t you want to do some research before recording your show so you don’t sound like an absolute dolt making fun of something for being “fake” when it’s an real thing in that experts field.
This podcaster thinks this expert is a “garbage witness” (direct quote) because they don’t believe someone can be an expert in this field.. but isn’t she friends with the Toth owner? Does she want to tell the toth how ridiculous she thinks having knowledge about “reading runes” and holding religious ceremonies is?
All Moo
Magical thinking | Psychology & Cognitive Development | Britannica
Magical thinking, the belief that one’s ideas, thoughts, actions, words, or use of symbols can influence the course of events in the material world. Magical thinking presumes a causal link between one’s inner, personal experience and the external physical world. Examples include beliefs that thewww.britannica.com
Re-calling Magical Thinking: Different, yet Connected Views on Magical Thinking
This essay recalls the concept of ‘magical thinking’ and provides a scooping description of its utilitarian value. ‘Magical thinking’ is a classic notion in cognitive anthropology, and it is seen as a utilitarian cognitive pattern that provides a pla...www.qeios.com
RA himself didn't confess to the crime and a certain time, he committed the murders, during his circa 61 confessions? Probably not important to him or he had no sense of time at all during his "mission".
I've always said you only needed to read the Footnotes section of the Infamous Franks Memo to realize the D was blowing smoke to say the least.Everyone has their own little quirk of a case they get fixated on (who fed those McStay dogs
For me on this case, it's the darned footnote in the Franks about the rope that the defence claimed might have been used to hang the victim by her feet.
I always knew that was wild speculation, because her hair would be full of blood and there would be ligature marks around her ankles.
But now we know from yesterdays reporting that the defence always knew that was an outright fabrication ... and put it in there anyway.
Where did they get the idea? My guess is 'trusted consultant' MW's mining of social media.
IMO
How do you think the states theory of this crime was magical thinking ?
Well they paid for Baldwin $12,600 to drive to Georgia to pic up FB photos from some random and he didn't even return with them.
The CAOs caselaw response to the lazy judge motion was literally quoting a footnote. So they do matter after all. MOO
I’m sorry, this is the first that I’m hearing that they don’t have these photos? They have shown them to several witnesses in these hearings.
<snipped & BBM>
You’re telling me that I can watch the court TV video and read the testimony of this expert and she will not say anything more descriptive now that she is actually seen the crime scene photos. She will regurgitate her exact same opinion.
All done! They finished late last night.
