Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #194

[girlhasnoname]

He said he was on the bridge.
He’s confessed with details over 61 times.
He put himself in those clothes along with the too long pants.
It doesn’t matter whether people think it looks like him or not.
He’s still on that bridge. Nobody can take him off.

View attachment 527587


Edit: edit
Edit: can’t spell either

Well hello RA=BG=Killer IMO (Same body frame, same leg/torso ratio with jeans, same hand in pockets habit)

Hopefully your Defense Team can get you to trial and prove your factual innocence and that you were conspired against by all of LE, ISP and FBI.

Or maybe they can't/won't because of all the evidence the State has AGAINST you, not counting your 61+ confessions.

I'm ready for #Justice4Abby&Libby, and for me, that means seeing you being behind bars for the rest of your life like the animal that you are. You hid in plain sight for far too long, tick tock.

MOO

 

[girlhasnoname]

When do we think voir dire will start?

Soon if the Defense doesn't try and pull a rabbit out of their hats to cause another delay.

moo

 

[iamshadow21]

RSBM

The main issue with the “circumstantial evidence” that you’ve highlighted is that it’s 80% hearsay and not even evidence that’s admissible in court. The things that aren’t hearsay aren’t exactly compelling. “On or around February 13”… so was it on, or was it around? If the defense had any evidence it was during the timeframe of the murders, it wouldn’t be couched in that way.

RSBM

On or about is standard legal jargon, in my experience.

On Or About Definition

www.nolo.com

 

[Niner]

10/14/24 - 11/15/24

I have it starting 10/15/24... do I have that wrong? TIA if someone can let me know!

 

[FrostedGlass]

I have it starting 10/15/24... do I have that wrong? TIA if someone can let me know!

That was the old date: new date is 10/14- 11/15
I put this behind a spoiler because it's so long to scoll by.

Spoiler Jury Trial Session: 10/15/2024 9:00 AM, Rescheduled Session: 10/16/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/17/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/18/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/21/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/22/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/23/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/24/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/25/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/28/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/29/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/30/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/31/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 11/01/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/14/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/15/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/16/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/17/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/18/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/21/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/22/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/23/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/24/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/25/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/28/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/29/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/30/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/31/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/01/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/04/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/05/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/06/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/07/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/08/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/11/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/12/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/13/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/14/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/15/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ

 

[sunshineray]

What's this about? Anybody know?

08/28/2024

Order Issued At request of counsel, Court orders the Clerk of Carroll County to withdraw the appearances of the attorneys delineated in the order, as they were entered as intervenors or for a limited purpose. Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Noticed: McLeland, Nicholas Charles Noticed: Baldwin, Andrew Joseph Noticed: Rozzi, Bradley Anthony Noticed: Luttrull, James David JR Noticed: Diener, Stacey Lynn Noticed: Auger, Jennifer Jones Order Signed:

 

[sunshineray]

Do we know why Dr. Fidler was subpoenaed? I can't remember.

I don't think it's been said but I believe she's been deposed once.

 

[sunshineray]

interesting. I've never heard of her in relation to this case and apparently the D wants to depose her. About what? Also interesting to me that the motion to quash subpoena comes from her, and not from the state.

I believe that's because they've already deposed her once?

 

[Niner]

That was the old date: new date is 10/14- 11/15
I put this behind a spoiler because it's so long to scoll by.

Spoiler Jury Trial Session: 10/15/2024 9:00 AM, Rescheduled Session: 10/16/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/17/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/18/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/21/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/22/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/23/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/24/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/25/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/28/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/29/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/30/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/31/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 11/01/2024 9:00 AM, Cancelled Session: 10/14/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/15/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/16/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/17/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/18/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/21/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/22/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/23/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/24/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/25/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/28/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/29/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/30/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 10/31/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/01/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/04/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/05/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/06/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/07/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/08/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/11/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/12/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/13/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/14/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 11/15/2024 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ

So - it DOES start on 10/14/24... thanks!

 

[sunshineray]

It's very curious!

According to the links provided by @Cyber sleuth above, she objects to the subpoena for deposition because: 1. She doesn't live or conduct business in Carroll County; 2. she received the subpoena only 9 days before being required to appear with no notice to rearrange her busy practice schedule (and Indiana law requires 10 days); and the subpoena did not offer her mileage and other witness/statutory fees which are required by law.

I thought she was one the people the D wanted to depose again, so she already had been, and the prosecution was calling it harassment?

 

[sunshineray]

Do you have any actual pictures of the south end of the bridge?

This is the hill

Eerie photos capture teens' death march 'down the hill'

Two schoolgirls were ordered to march down a hill by the man who murdered them.

www.nzherald.co.nz

 

[katydid23]

Unfortunately, BB and SC’s descriptions in no way align. Two different men. SC reported seeing a muddy man (not bloody) wearing a tan jacket (not blue). This is part of the discovery. FM pg 115,116. Whatever one thinks of the FM, one cannot deny a taped interview that will likely come into evidence at trial. Someone lied on the PCA and this will be exposed. JMHO

Not only taped interview but the witnesses will most likely testify. They will be asked about their confirmation of BG being the man they both saw. If they are confident and sincere the jury will probably accept that identification. IMO

 

[katydid23]

Google Earth view of the south end of the bridge. The white "ribbon" on the left is the private drive. If you expand the image, you can see a path beginning at the end of the bridge and going toward the 2 properties. That's the abandoned rr that you mentioned. RR are set upon a deep base of rocks called ballast. Those rocks are generally left behind when the rails and ties are removed.

Understanding The Railroad Track Ballast - R&S Track, Inc.

Have you ever wondered why railroad tracks have layers of crushed rocks underneath them? Learn more about the railroad track ballast.

rstrackinc.com

View attachment 527437

Would the kidnapper want to walk two girls at gunpoint towards private property and driveways?