If the lawyer is going to claim that the conditions of his confinement were so bad that he had mental issues that caused him to confess all these times, then why not have a medical professional say that? It makes no sense to claim someone was treated so badly he confessed due to mental duress and then you don't have any diagnosis to back that up. If they did have him evaluated and it was determined he was having a psychotic break or something like that, then it would be more believable that this is why he was confessing to crimes they claim he didn't do.If he was my client, I wouldn’t have a psych evaluation done either. What better way to tell my client, the state, the judge and jury, the media and the general public that I had concerns for his mental state? Surely that would create a bias against him. And since opinions of people are subjective, why would I trust anyone to set the record the way I needed it to go as his lawyer? That’s a roll of the roulette wheel I wouldn’t want to risk. Especially if doing so may ALsO allow the state access to his prior medical records via disclosure or cross of the expert. No thanks. IMO it’s better they haven’t done this. Moooo
You said why would I trust anyone to set the record the way I needed it to go??
What about if they are making these claims against the place he's being held and those that are in charge of him, then they better not worry about how things need to go and worry about if what they are claiming is actually true. They throw it all out in court filings as if it's fact, but they don't know that it is fact. They just want it to be to explain why their client is confessing to most people he came into contact with.