AugustWest
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
- Messages
- 719
- Reaction score
- 8,314
One would be to make sure you have all offers of proof on the record for appeal. Another would be that offers of proof are made outside the presence of a jury, so you limit exposure to prejudicial information given to them.I misspoke and I follow you, but my question remains the same. DT wanted that stuff in state did not. Is there any advantage to the DT not playing all their available cards to see that they got in what they wanted? Is there any advantage to not play those cards until trial?
I am experienced in elder law, not criminal, so my knowledge of that topic is limited to what I learn following cases. Thanks for being willing to answer our questions in this case.
ETA: I don't want to go too deeply into motions in limine, procedure and strategy, but here is a good read on that subject