TTF14
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 15,799
- Reaction score
- 73,222
But 61 confessions from the horse’s mouth mean nothing?
Have I ever said that?
But 61 confessions from the horse’s mouth mean nothing?
RBBMPlus RA owned (was it registered? I think it was) a SS gun that matched the ejector tool markings on the unspent bullet that was recovered according to the ISP Ballistics Lab. LE would have needed a SW to obtain a gun to compare the markings. No wonder we have Franks 1-5, although I still think there will be some form of electronic or physical (DNA) match recovered during the search that ties RA to the crimes.
Between the countless confessions, witness testimony, self incrimination about being there that day in the same basic clothing including a face covering leaves little rooms for doubt to me. Unless RA has a long lost identical twin or happens to be the most unlucky guy in the entire universe BG=RA=Killer.
I'm thinking RA came into focus after he was tipped by someone, an alibi fell apart, or they did indeed start a total review of all tips from day 1.
Brick by brick...#Justice4Abby&Libby
MOO
I'd forgotten about this recovered item from the search warrant:RBBM
Items seized begin at page 15: https://www.wishtv.com/wp-content/u...3915-FFC47C07-5DAF-414E-9879-66EEBA100263.pdf
Speaking of electronic evidence, they recovered at least 13 cell phones during the search warrant execution a his residence. I'm sure I probably missed one or two in scanning the SW Receipt. And external hard drives, memory cards etc; it is IMO that I believe we'll find out at trial that one of those cell phones was at the crime scene on 13 Februry 2017. I'm also willing to bet that it won't be the one that he reported to the Conservation Officer DD that he was carrying that day. That 'reporting' that took place in a random grocery store parking lot --- that was no pre-arranged meeting to give a statement IMO (not in a darn parking lot). DD was probably randomly approached by RA that day and whipped out his notebook to take notes - ergo no recording of it. It simply wasn't "an assigned lead" which Dulin has already stated he usually records. IMO, you simply are not interviewing "an assigned lead" in a grocery store parking lot.
Also recovered during the search: "Hair Bands". We've all seen Abby's last tragic photo. In that photo she has her hair pulled back and up. I'm wondering if the hair band she had it tied back with was missing from the crime scene and was potentially recovered at his residence. IMO, could explain why that odd item would be seized, the commentary about "DNA" potentially being found (but NOT, as the Frank's put it, at the crime scene itself!) and the genetic testing.
The last bit that has me pondering as a potentially "weird item to recover" is that motorcycle cover. Why? What is up with that item. I have an odd feeling it too is going to come into play at trial IMO.
Yeah, like Letby's first handover sheet from her first student nurse shift, perfectly preserved in a gold and roses keepsake box.I'd forgotten about this recovered item from the search warrant:
"[...]One .40 caliber S&W cartridge found in wooden keepsake box on dresser".
It almost sounds like a trophy.
Exactly.That’s just simply not true.
The defense can use geofence data. They can’t misuse the geofence data.
View attachment 529169
I’m not sure why the narrative keeps getting twisted with the geofence data.
Not if it's inferior data and the more accurate GPS data is available. MO
I've said before when discussing this particular item that I do believe it was 'his trophy'.I'd forgotten about this recovered item from the search warrant:
"[...]One .40 caliber S&W cartridge found in wooden keepsake box on dresser".
It almost sounds like a trophy.
I'm not gun-racking savvy so bear with me. Are you saying he racked/ejected a bullet on the bridge and then another one between the girls?I've said before when discussing this particular item that I do believe it was 'his trophy'.
I also think that while he was in the frenzy of committing the crime he forgot that he racked his weapon as recorded when 'on the bridge', so he racked it a second time at the crime scene itself for whatever reason. Then saved that second racked bullet as his 'trophy' (a little bit of 'this is the bullet I controlled them with' and I can revisit it anytime). He just didn't realize that he ejected the first one onto the ground between Libby and Abby when he did so.
Some people do not carry their weapon with a round chambered so they do not risk an accidental discharge. So they would have to rack in a round before firing. If they forgot they had already racked in a round, the round in the chamber would be ejected when they racked the weapon a second time. This makes sense as to why RA left an unfired round on the ground.I've said before when discussing this particular item that I do believe it was 'his trophy'.
I also think that while he was in the frenzy of committing the crime he forgot that he racked his weapon as recorded when 'on the bridge', so he racked it a second time at the crime scene itself for whatever reason. Then saved that second racked bullet as his 'trophy' (a little bit of 'this is the bullet I controlled them with' and I can revisit it anytime). He just didn't realize that he ejected the first one onto the ground between Libby and Abby when he did so.
Sorry. That's my Army speak.I'm not gun-racking savvy so bear with me. Are you saying he racked/ejected a bullet on the bridge and then another one between the girls?