MissJames
a yellowflutterby changed my life : )
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2008
- Messages
- 6,658
- Reaction score
- 1,304
I am not convinced by any of the evidence that Casey intentionally killed Caylee and some of the evidence that was allowed into the trial doesn't seem to be fair. An example is the heart shaped residue that was noticed by an FBI witness which she showed to a supervisor but neither one of them photographs this piece of evidence. She is allowed to testify about it but the jury is expected to take her word that the heart shaped residue was there and it was from a heart shaped sticker that links back to Casey. That seemed to me to be no kind of evidence at all. Another piece of evidence that the prosecution used was the picture of Caylee AND Casey in which the witness made an animation (my word, I'm not sure what word to use here)of Caylee's skull to move over her little face and then put the duct tape over her face (beside the picture of Casey) to show the what they thought must have happened. This witness said he pulled a picture of Caylee off the internet to use. But he chose to use a photo of both Caylee (morphed into a skull with duct tape over her mouth and nose)and Casey side by side. It just didn't "sit right" with me because I felt that animation was not required at all to show their theory of what happened.
I just don't see anything that tells me that Casey planned and murdered Caylee Marie Anthony. I think that Casey caused Caylee's death (truthfully, who else was there?) but I don't believe she meant to kill her. I think she loved Caylee. I also think that if she wanted rid of her child, she would have just given her to Cindy and George.
I don't believe in the death penalty and it shocks me that so many people are so positive that they know that this woman is guilty of premeditated murder and that she should have her life terminated by the state.
Just my opinion
The witness who saw the heart shaped sticky residue was a credible witness,who was simply stating what she saw. It will be up to each juror to decide whether or not to give it any weight.
Dr.Spitz showed a picture of what he called brain dust. He didn't have it tested so the jurors will each have to do decide for themselves if they believe it based just on his say so.
That's what jurors are for .
I can't speak for anyone else ,but I have read discovery documents,depos,watched the hearings and LE interviews,poured over computer and telephone records,and on and on,for almost 3 years now. Not the media stuff,because they can get their facts wrong.All the documents can be found here.
That's why I,and I believe so many others,feel she is guilty as sin.We know this case inside and out.