Adolph Hitler's Parents Lose Custody of the Kids!

[lonetraveler]

Link

Parents lose custody of son Adolf Hitler
By QMI Agency
Last Updated: August 6, 2010 11:59am

Parents who have given their kids Nazi-inspired names — including naming one little boy Adolf Hitler — have lost custody of their three children.

Heath and Deborah Campbell's children were taken out of their home in Phillipsburg, New Jersey, in January after the family tried to get a birthday cake with their son's name on it at a local ShopRite.

The youngest child, a baby, is named Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie, named after Heinrich Luitpold Himmler, a Nazi politician. A second daughter is named JoyceLynn Aryan Nation — Aryan Nations is a white nationalist neo-Nazi organization. All three have been in foster care.

On Thursday, an appeals court said there was evidence of abuse in the home, Fox News reported.

Despite a gag order, the parents spoke to Fox News, saying they don't think it's right.

"We have a right to have our kids named. A name's a name," Heath said in the interview. "Our kids are beautiful kids, they're not going to grow up to hate people, they're not going to grow up to hurt people."

Maybe not but they are gonna get their :censored: kicked every day once they start school. JMO

The names alone qualify as abuse.

OT, but I wonder why the combtooth mustache has never come back in style?

I am all for freedom but when you get a couple of Neanderthals like this who cruelly name their children after mass murderers then there needs to be interference in these children's lives. Obviously, the parents are lacking in mental skills and are willing to put their children through pure hell all the years of their lives. It needs to stop, now. With names like that, these children do not stand a chance. Let me modify that statement, with parents who would name their children after mass murderers, the children do not stand a chance. Just the desire to name their children after mass murderers show that these Neanderthals do not need to raise these children with the same inbred thoughts and philosophies and values as they, themselves hold. Believe me when I say that I definitely know what I'm talking about. I'm very knowledgeable about this type of lifestyle and just leave it at that. These children need to be removed from these freaks. Trust me, I know what I'm talking about.

 

[lonetraveler]

Man, they better make alot of room in foster care if they're going to remove children from their parents because they teach racism.

You mean to say then that every child born to anyone in The New Black Panther Party be removed? How about if they name their kids King Shabazz? Call DHS, CPS and any other social service out there?

Then they'll have to move on to The True Israelites. I'd be taking up an entire page here naming every racist group known to mankind who teach their kids their views.

How can someone be happy that people's children are taken away for the mere reason they're backward? Being racist isn't a reason to remove children from their parents. Eventually all these kids are going to grow up and make up their own minds. Live their own lives. Just because mom's and pop's are racist, bigoted folks don't mean their children will grow up and do the same.

This is America. You can name your kids anything you want. If indeed the parents are abusive then bring it on, but if they're doing the very best they can weather disabled or not people's children should remain with their parents. Lord if we had a nickel for every poor kid that gets sent back to parents that beat them, tortured them, left them alone at home while they went out and smoked crack and exposed them to felons we'd be millionaires. Nope, these people IMO are being punished and so are their kids for the fact they made bad choices in names.

What's in a name? It always reminds me of Michael King not having his name legally changed to Martin Luther King.

Name me extreme but I truly believe that children of radical groups that beleive in harm to other people be removed from that kind of brain washing, now. I believe that these children as wll as Black Panther radicals' children should be removed from the "cult" type of teaching of these parents. Racism runs both ways. I know all about how that works. I grew up in it. These children will very likely grow up with the same mind thought that they have been taught all their lives. It's called brainwashing and it is extremely hard to change. I know what I'm talking about, do you?

 

[lonetraveler]

I am SO happy...In almost all cases, I would be against removal of children...but we canNOT afford to continue to teach children racism if we have any hope of this country moving in a positive direction...JMO...

I truly support the removal of children of all extreme radical groups, including the Black Panthers, muslins and all the rest of extreme radical groups, not just the white supremast. All of them are equally dangerous.

 

[lonetraveler]

The other kids' parents would respond and by extension it would definitely set up and negatively affect the kids, IMO. No doubt the parents aren't the brightest but I don't see how they could have not foreseen negative reactions that would impact their kids lives...I cannot see this as the same as 'Herbert' because they purposefully named their kids names that have huge historical negative connotations which I don't care how slow they are, they would have known...just maybe not cared enough, or were militant enough, to think it was okay to set their kids up for this... all MOO...

These parents did this on purpose to show their beliefs to others. They did not even take the time to think about how this would affect the children themselves. Totally a selfish move on their part. They meant to use their children to make a statement and indeed they did. How very cruel to the children to do this. If the parents wanted to make their own statement to society, then do it, but leave innocent children out of it. Sick, very sick.

 

[lonetraveler]

All the kids named Herbert or whatever name children find unattractive could provoke the same issues these kids name names could. I doubt children would respond at all to the names until at least 6th grade.


I do not think these people ever thought of what it would look like on an job application because they do not consider those as everyday parts of life.:waitasec:

I dont think they set out to have their children discriminated agaisnt by naming the children this. They thought they were being loyal to their messed up belief system.
I think they are limited thinkers who did not look at the big picture when naming their children.
I agree it did set them up for failure. It doesnt make it abuse because of the way OTHER people may , could, or do respond to the children. Now the parents are idiots and didnt look at the overall effect but it is personal choice and these names are not new names.They have been arround awhile.they are just tainted by history.



Btw Herbert got beat up alot most of it was verbal but I always wonder what his life would have been like if his name had been steve. He could have pulled off Steve.

You can't even try to compare Hubert to Adolph Hitler, really?????????????? These parents obviously put a lot of thought into naming their child after an infamous mass murderer of millions..........Puuuuuuuuuuuuuulease, don't try to sugarcoat this. They knew exactly what they were doing. They really didn't give a fig how if affected the children through life. These two only thought of themselves when they made this decision. They were "making a statement" at the expense of their own children. "NOT NEW NAMES"????????? You can bet your tootie they are not new names! Infamous actually. They meant what they did and have definitely proved that they would do it again and again as long as they upset people to do it. Does this look like they actually give a crap about the children????????? Really?

 

[lonetraveler]

ITA!!!!! Kids have to grow up in a cruel world and IMO only a parent will some serious issues would name kids something that would obviously put them in peril's way and lead to them being tormented and ostracized...Notice in my post I didn't say they should be taken away for being given this name...I said it should have been the first sign something was amiss and needed to be further investigated. If that had happened, perhaps these later charges would not have come to be...One of the articles claims the oldest (Hitler, I believe?) has threatened to kill people (at 4 years old)...Where does a 4 y.o. come up with this? Not from his name obviously...Has to have heard/seen this kind of talk...

Off hand I would say that the 4 yr. old Hitler said that he wanted to kill people because the people who named him Hitler taught him that he needs to want to kill people. That's my take on it.

 

[lonetraveler]

All the kids named Herbert or whatever name children find unattractive could provoke the same issues these kids name names could. I doubt children would respond at all to the names until at least 6th grade.


I do not think these people ever thought of what it would look like on an job application because they do not consider those as everyday parts of life.:waitasec:

I dont think they set out to have their children discriminated agaisnt by naming the children this. They thought they were being loyal to their messed up belief system.
I think they are limited thinkers who did not look at the big picture when naming their children.
I agree it did set them up for failure. It doesnt make it abuse because of the way OTHER people may , could, or do respond to the children. Now the parents are idiots and didnt look at the overall effect but it is personal choice and these names are not new names.They have been arround awhile.they are just tainted by history.



Btw Herbert got beat up alot most of it was verbal but I always wonder what his life would have been like if his name had been steve. He could have pulled off Steve.

Respectfully, I don't know how you can compare the name Herbert to Adolph Hitler?????????????? Really????????? Yes, these people did not think at all about how this name would affect their child. All they thought about were themselves at the time. Their mind thought was that they would use this baby to "make a statement to the world" at the baby's expense. Very thoughtless and cruel, I think.

 

[lonetraveler]

Put well Filly.

As much as this makes me sick and is against everything I believe in, It is not abuse. One can name their children anything they want to. I don't think that should be classified as abuse and warrant their children being taken away. They may be Aryan Nation Followers. I find it just tasteless, and sick.

I think what probably happened is this brought attention to the family and problems that were hidden were uncovered and that is the reason the children were taken away.

I do not know if the letter is true, but that sounds like a good enough reason for the children to be yanked out of the household.

Goz

EXACTLY! The children's names brought attention and the family problems were brought to light and the children were taken away. Did the Neanderthals think that the names would not be noticed???????????????? NO, they knew that the names would be noticed, that is why they chose the names. Well, they were noticed, the results were that the Neanderthals had their children taken away. They should not be surprised at all, this is what they worked so hard at.

 

[lonetraveler]

Reading this thread I have come to the realization that there are many, many young people who have absolutely no idea who Adolph Hitler is or for what he stands for what World War II was all about or what the Holocaust is. With that in mind, please, for those of you who do not have any idea what Adolph Hitler and the Holocaust is, please google and read. If you have read, please do not ever mistake naming your child Adolph Hitler with naming your child after alcoholic drinks as the same. It isn't even in the same class of conversation...............please.

 

[lonetraveler]

I think it is really bad form, and I feel bad for the kids, but I wouldn't call it abuse...

If you want to remove these kids because of their names then I guess we will also be removing all the other kids with questionalble names... I, personally, know a girl named Satin Sheets and her sister is Tequila Sunrise... Or what about the kid whose Mom named him (Hmmm, how to type this without getting a time-out...) S--THEAD, but she promounced it Sha-Theed...

I totally agree it sucks for the kids but I think removing them from the home is a bit much... I mean, they don't remove kids from their parents even when they are card carrying members of the KKK.

PS--- I may be a smidge jaded because I wanted to give our little girl "Pearly Gates" as a middle name and OMG you would not believe the amount of crud I got for that... In the end, I caved and we named her after my Grams...

I recommend that you google Hitler and World War II and get to know what this name represents, it is not even comparable to Satin Sheets or any other moronic name.

 

[Filly]

I truly support the removal of children of all extreme radical groups, including the Black Panthers, muslins and all the rest of extreme radical groups, not just the white supremast. All of them are equally dangerous.

That would be the NEW Black Panther Party. Are you grouping all Muslims as radical? Nobody said the parents of these children were white supremacists. If they are that's ironic.

Dangerous are the people that keep their beliefs and views quiet. There's more hate mongers behind closed doors than all those groups put together.

My sincere regret you had to grow up "in it", but that doesn't make you exempt.

How do you suppose we go round up the kids? You would go take a few kids off the members of The True Israelites? That group screams in your face for the sole fact people are blue eyed devils. Right up through a bullhorn.

Equally dangerous to radical groups are people ready to take their kids off them for their beliefs.

 

[Filly]

There's a lot of very good reasons for their removal. They said they wouldn't remove them due to their names alone. My question is if it constitutes abuse which I believe it does, but if you read the second article there is a lot going on there.

Steely I read it. I just wonder why nobody called CPS or DHS on them prior. Maybe I missed that. I agree with you that it sounds like alot was going on. Definately then those kids need to be somewhere safe. Then again are they being used as scapegoats? Just playing devil's advocate there.

Still I don't believe naming them as they did is abusive. JMO I understand yours as well. :blowkiss:

Mind you I've never held it against you that your hat is named after you know what. :dance::dance::dance:

Bottom line these kids have to be safe. I wonder what they'll do about their names now that they are not going back with their parents? I suggest Apple, Orange, and Prince Michael the 20th.

 

[nosysw]

Man, they better make alot of room in foster care if they're going to remove children from their parents because they teach racism.

You mean to say then that every child born to anyone in The New Black Panther Party be removed? How about if they name their kids King Shabazz? Call DHS, CPS and any other social service out there?

Then they'll have to move on to The True Israelites. I'd be taking up an entire page here naming every racist group known to mankind who teach their kids their views.

How can someone be happy that people's children are taken away for the mere reason they're backward? Being racist isn't a reason to remove children from their parents. Eventually all these kids are going to grow up and make up their own minds. Live their own lives. Just because mom's and pop's are racist, bigoted folks don't mean their children will grow up and do the same.

This is America. You can name your kids anything you want. If indeed the parents are abusive then bring it on, but if they're doing the very best they can weather disabled or not people's children should remain with their parents. Lord if we had a nickel for every poor kid that gets sent back to parents that beat them, tortured them, left them alone at home while they went out and smoked crack and exposed them to felons we'd be millionaires. Nope, these people IMO are being punished and so are their kids for the fact they made bad choices in names.

What's in a name? It always reminds me of Michael King not having his name legally changed to Martin Luther King.

Apparently you did not read my previous post(s) where I stated that this was not the sole reason for removal but indicative of other issues (which apparently it was based on the court's ruling as I do NOT believe they took these children away because the parents are "backward")...

 

[Soulmagent]

Reading this thread I have come to the realization that there are many, many young people who have absolutely no idea who Adolph Hitler is or for what he stands for what World War II was all about or what the Holocaust is. With that in mind, please, for those of you who do not have any idea what Adolph Hitler and the Holocaust is, please google and read. If you have read, please do not ever mistake naming your child Adolph Hitler with naming your child after alcoholic drinks as the same. It isn't even in the same class of conversation...............please.

After reading a thread where a question was posed is it abusive to name a child Adolph Hitler an seeing other peoples responces you decided we do not know anything about this part of history?
Seems Persecution had some motivation behind Hitlers action much like the following statement seems to imply should happen in you opinoin.

I truly support the removal of children of all extreme radical groups, including the Black Panthers, muslins and all the rest of extreme radical groups, not just the white supremast. All of them are equally dangerous.

So these groups of people are okay to strip of the parental rights?
One mans freedom fighter is anothers terroriost.

You can't even try to compare Hubert to Adolph Hitler, really?????????????? These parents obviously put a lot of thought into naming their child after an infamous mass murderer of millions..........Puuuuuuuuuuuuuulease, don't try to sugarcoat this. They knew exactly what they were doing. They really didn't give a fig how if affected the children through life. These two only thought of themselves when they made this decision. They were "making a statement" at the expense of their own children. "NOT NEW NAMES"????????? You can bet your tootie they are not new names! Infamous actually. They meant what they did and have definitely proved that they would do it again and again as long as they upset people to do it. Does this look like they actually give a crap about the children????????? Really?

I wasnt comparing the two people only their names an the possible rejection to them by other children. In responce to a specific post.
If they choose to have those veiws in their life they are free to have them and name their children whatever screwed up name that those beliefs inspire.

Steely I read it. I just wonder why nobody called CPS or DHS on them prior. Maybe I missed that. I agree with you that it sounds like alot was going on. Definately then those kids need to be somewhere safe. Then again are they being used as scapegoats? Just playing devil's advocate there.

Still I don't believe naming them as they did is abusive. JMO I understand yours as well. :blowkiss:

Mind you I've never held it against you that your hat is named after you know what. :dance::dance::dance:

Bottom line these kids have to be safe. I wonder what they'll do about their names now that they are not going back with their parents? I suggest Apple, Orange, and Prince Michael the 20th.

Great post Filly.

 

[Snick1946]

Too bad there wasn't some way to have removed the original Adolf Hitler from his abusive family back in the 1890's. His father beat his wife and the kids on a constant basis. No, you can't hang everything he did on his lousy childhood but it sure didn't help.

 

[Steely Dan]

 

[Gozgals]

It is so true. I have to tell you how I was even accused of showing someone NAZI literature, who am I, Jesse? I mean I was a Holocaust defender since the age of 10...Dang, these Nazi things get around.

Picture is the best I have seen in a long time. Cracked me up.

Got to figure out how to put on my computer.

All they scream about in mental hospitals too is when the Nazi's are coming and about the UFO's talking to them..Wonder when some of these hospitals are going to give pts. the proper care...?


Always Goz

 

[Filly]

I am SO happy...In almost all cases, I would be against removal of children...but we canNOT afford to continue to teach children racism if we have any hope of this country moving in a positive direction...JMO...

Apparently I did read each post here. I read yours. Then I came to this one.

Maybe I am backward? That post IMO says you're happy. Right? You're against removal of children in almost all cases. Right? Then the "but" comes in. We canNOT afford to continue to teach children racism........

Hey, I agree with you there, but unfortunately that isn't going to happen anytime soon. If kids were removed from homes where one or both parents are racist the courts would be overwhelmed. Then you'd have to walk the fine line of exactly what racism is. Weed out the seperatists from the racists from the supremacists.

This is a sensitive issue. Point blank I can tell you just because a child is taught something doesn't mean they grow into an adult who shares the parents view. Heck, sometimes it goes the other way. Naming that little guy Adolph Hitler was a boneheaded move. Still, it doesn't mean the kid is going to grow up to try and take down gays, Jews, Poles, Catholics and the like.

 

[Filly]

Too bad there wasn't some way to have removed the original Adolf Hitler from his abusive family back in the 1890's. His father beat his wife and the kids on a constant basis. No, you can't hang everything he did on his lousy childhood but it sure didn't help.

Snick that's an excellent point. Alois had huge issues. This thread is about the children so poorly named, but Alois being a Schicklgruber I believe had a profound effect on Adolph.

Hitler really and truly wanted to be an artist. I can't say his work was all that great, but who knows? Who knows what may have happened if his childhood was different? Maybe he would have stayed in Austria and painted landscapes.

 

[Steely Dan]

Snick that's an excellent point. Alois had huge issues. This thread is about the children so poorly named, but Alois being a Schicklgruber I believe had a profound effect on Adolph.

Hitler really and truly wanted to be an artist. I can't say his work was all that great, but who knows? Who knows what may have happened if his childhood was different? Maybe he would have stayed in Austria and painted landscapes.

On a similar note if Fidel Castro had been a better pitcher he would have stayed in the major leagues.