aggravated waiting for the Aggravation phase #3

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
My opinion is Hayden thought this was "the get of his career" so he coddled her just for the interview (and any future interviews) simply for the feather in his cap.
Kiefer on the other hand was driven by something much more personal...a hatred for Juan Martinez.

Hayden imo, is much less biased and doesn't appear to be reporting things as 'fact" which are mere fabrications or embellishments.


Yeah, and??? It probably was a big deal for his career. That is his job as a journalist. I don't fault him in it at all. In fact many other journalists have expressed jealousy that he got it. People watched it. They were glued to it. So, to take it out on him, in my opinion is just hypocritical.

Everyone who is criticizing him, is also glued to the interview. So what does that say? Peeps don't want to admit that they are glued to her. Just like CA. It used to aggravate the crap out of me with the same stuff. picture after picture of her. I hated it, and didn't want to look at her.

Just like how everyone here claims to despise her, yet page after page peeps keep posting pictures of her I don't get it. Pick one. Seriously.
 
GAWD the biased inaccurate "journalism" on this case...arrrgh!

Kiefer's story day after the verdict reports how a photo was admitted showing Arias in Travis eye reflection "vaguely" showing her standing there without a knife or gun but camera in her hand.

Just because the State stipulated to her not holding a gun/knife when she shot that photo does NOT mean that photo demonstrated that. It was just as easy a "dog with a stick it's mouth" a "mexican chihuahua" or a "gopher" or Alyce Laviolette and her buck teeth for all I know . But to report that as "FACT"...that the photo showed this?

He's lost his damn mind.

He seems to have a eerrrrrrrrr hard-xx for Juan Martinez
 
If I hear 'Born in Captivity' as if she's talking about a Panda cub Imma gonna go JA on her a$$!:floorlaugh:

I love how we hear facts at times from THs that aren't really how do you say? Quite right? Correct?

JMO

OMG, this made me laugh! A friend of mine and I were talking last week and she was all mad at her husband over something. She said he'd better apologize that night or she'd "Go all Jodi Arias on his AZZ!"

Does that make her a verb, or an adjective?

:floorlaugh:
 
Isn't it interesting that Jodi wanted a plea so that the bad side of Travis wouldn't come out? Of course she didn't want a plea so she could get a lesser sentence.

i think she tried to take a plea because she didn't want all the bad things about HER coming out. its all about jodi remember :facepalm:
 
I was just assigned a male BPD.. the emotional intensity was draining..set my limits and boundaries..and oh yes he called my receptionist to say IF you don't page her I will kill myself".( btw 25 min after I spoke with him).Well that got the office rockin and rollin..when my asst director called me..I did (relunctantly call him) and he didn't "remember" the threat..wanted to talk about Ellen Show...Just so ya know...he has access to a crisis unit and ER which he uses quite independently...Needless to say..MY limits and boundaries are now honored throughout my MH agency ..ands yep he knows calls like that I send the police and an ambulance...Not me...it works.....

Curious, what kind of treatment do you use with a BP client?
 
:seeya: SyraKelly! Good to see you.

I'm not a journalist.... but I have a family member who is. And....I've TOTALLY taken a guided tour through CNN! :dance: (Which means what I'm about to say is worth slightly more than two cents, but not above five cents.)

MOO, this guy doesn't get to say when his piece is run. His producer does. Now if he were Brian Williams (or any nationally run veteran journalist), he might have some say.

They gotta run the piece when it's timely. It's just business. Bunch of people watching the verdict, great time to advertise the upcoming story, want to get that piece in before the general population loses interest and is on to a new hot news story.

I'm middle of the road on this. I get why people are disgusted. I was disgusted....so I just haven't watched it. (I actually never watch when she speaks because she's a sociopathic murderer and her words are valueless gobledygoop to me) But journalism is now also synonymous with sensationalism. And getting the scoop first is king. MOO! :seeya:

I have a question they may have been answered earlier.... So ALV.....when do we get to find out about that closed door meeting she had with the judge a while back? And would anything regarding that hearing/meeting make her unusable for the mitigating phase? :please:



:seeya:Mag,Good to see you to

We may find out after the records are unsealed after the trial ends
 
Sorry, so way behind - took a day off yesterday! LOL! Just wanted to make a few comments...

Harmony - love your signature blue heart!! :peace:

Okay - I have seen CKJA = which I take as Convicted Killer Jodie Arias - right?? :D

but - MMWJA = ?? maybe Murdering Manic Jodie Arias ?? :whoosh:

We've seen Juror 5 and now 8 has spoken out a little bit, but I've been wondering about Juror 11, the Hispanic one. What's he doing? Was it ever confirmed that he was at court for the verdict?

is there a link for their interviews? I didn't see one yet, but I'm only on page one... trying to "refresh", without "refreshing" :pcguru: :floorlaugh:

i'm all for a free press but i have nothing but contempt for this guy. it's possible that the interview he did with a convicted murderer will be responsible for screwing up this whole trial. i think it's irresponsible to the max---and it was all done for ratings, which they surely got.

if it in ANY WAY derails this trial and justice for the alexander family, then this guy's career should just be over, IMO.

the good of society should trump the ratings for FOX news, IMO.
And caused the trial to be delayed. You would think an exclusive would be to one of the victims families. Very tacky.

the two bolded above - do you think that's the reason or CKJA didn't want to wear stripes, and threw a fit? :jail:

he's not a sell out creep IMO.. he is doing his job.. He is giving what society wants to see... How many of us here at WS watched that video.

:notgood: nope...

I bet this is when/why Jodi went off yesterday, if in fact the rumor turns out to be true that she did. Beth K. is saying that she was told that Jodi would have to now go to court in her black & whites since she is NOW a convicted felon - UNLESS and until her attorney's actually file with the court to allow her to change into civilian clothes. According to Beth K., that didn't appear to have happened because the officers were ready to bring Jodi into court in her black & whites...
Link: http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2013/05/09/nr-banfield-karas-jodi-arias-psych-ward.cnn

:floorlaugh:

I believe that Travis did not ask for the death penalty and yet JA in 2 minutes gave him just that. Yet his justice still lies in her control; how is that right? I believe that the Alexander family has at times wondered how they will go on, and have cried themselves to sleep. Yet JA can provide an interview following her conviction to his murder, and distract from the Justice for Travis.

Life with out parole can not be an option for JA because she will never allow the Alexander family to rest. Even if she gets the death penalty, she will make it as difficult as possible with multiple appeals, etc. This is her way of showing the Alexander family how she was able to control another situation, and guess what, she did just that.

The Alexander family has to play by the defense rules, and it is unfortunate that even after she is convicted, she can still manipulate the system as though it owes her justice. I really wish now that she has been convicted they could bring her up on slander charges, or do something to stop her from trashing him. So sad.

great post, Words2Serve - also wondering if the Alexander family came also add in the civil case - Jodie will NOT talk/write/think about Travis at ALL!

Okay - will continue to read!

:seeya:
 
Still thye would of have set-up cameras/lighting etc... how the heck did the court allow this to happen?

Coming back into Estrella as a convicted felon, she would probably HAVE NOT been allowed to give interviews because of security, etc. because she would be moved from "Un-Sentenced" to "Sentenced" area of Estrella.

Because she was in the basement of the Courthouse, there's that fine line between courthouse security and Sheriffs.

JA probably knew that if she got M1, this would be her only opportunity. She probably asked a LOT of questions BEFORE her original "Deal" with Troy, to find out what the SOP was AFTER the verdict. Transport is such that there is no "Perp Walk" between the court and the holding cell or Jail/Prison transport like other jurisdictions.

I am snickering to myself that a local newsman got in there, instead of the "reporters" from quasi "news" programs I will not name. The timing of the report, I had my questions, but better sooner than later. It won't be there to trivialize or take the attention away from the Alexander's impact statements, or any comments the family may want to give to the media....I hope...fingers crossed.

I don't think Sheriff Joe will be obligated, in anyway, to allow JA any interviews through the rest of the court process, and after that, she should be going to an evaluation center before her transport to Perryville, unless they're killing 2 birds with one stone, with her current "Suicide Protocol". (Lower Buckeye Jail used to do the evaluations, but I don't know what their current operations consist of.) I don't believe interviews are allowed during the evaluation process, which usually takes a month. (But that could be by-passed because of DR)

Would like KCL's opinion on this: I think at this point, the Alexanders may have seen this as just "another Jodie" and ignored it.

I think if I was one of Travis' siblings, I would know that anything I said in the VIS would NOT effect the convicted on a human level, but I would want it documented in the court records. For some reason, I think JA will try to continue doodling while the VIS's are being read. I don't think anything could be said, that would break her delusional state.

Kind of ironic that she'd make the motion for video taped VIS as to not prejudice the jury, when she directly goes out and has a video taped interview directly after her guilty verdict....how prejudicial is that? I don't think that the jurors would take her words very kindly.
 
My opinion is Hayden thought this was "the get of his career" so he coddled her just for the interview (and any future interviews) simply for the feather in his cap.

Kiefer on the other hand was driven by something much more personal...a hatred for Juan Martinez.

Hayden imo, is much less biased and doesn't appear to be reporting things as 'fact" which are mere fabrications or embellishments.

Kiefer is a moron for allowing his hatred of JM to run down the prosecution team and to speak on Jodi's behalf. FJA already admitted her guilt so to trash the prosecutor during the trial for his own sense of pleasure is disgusting to me.
 
RE: jury pay..I am from the great Lake Port city of Erie, Pa..Jurors make $8.00/day @ least 1.5 yrs ago they did...That covered breakfast :) and parking... Of course not picked... I work in MH , my daugher is a real CSI- from Miami to Broward county and son inlaw a SWAT and Sniper for Coral Springs PD. Work pays me " civil leave" since never picked don't know how long that lasts..Guess this trial has @ least motivated me to ask that question to my employer....
 
So what did Juan ever do to him? Or is it something nobody knows?

I'm not going in to all of it publicly as he vented to me twice about it. But his feelings are clear and venomous I will tell you that. And he turned some of it on me as well which is the only reason I'm speaking publicly about it at all. After those crappy remarks he made about me to my face, I'm done with him after 20 years of friendship. I was holding on to it for dear life but he threw down a hammer and I walked away.

He basically told me my life was in ruins as evidenced by the fact I was attending the trial, that I was a "completely different person" from the one he once knew and that was not a compliment. He's anti DP so I'm telling you, DP opponents turn on murder victims' families eventually, considering them the "enemy" and judging us for having the audacity to hold these murderers accountable. Like the entire death penalty is our fault. And he's jumped the shark right in to that place.

I cut the cord that day and could say a whole lot more of what I know of how far gone he is in terms of bias but I don't really want to give it any more energy. I guess I got stirred up today reading his article claiming yet ANOTHER BS inaccuracy as fact.

I will say this, Kiefer is the one who EMBELLISHED in a story saying Juan was walking out of court daily to throngs of media and "fans" when in reality he walked out that door a total of ONE time during the entire trial for about 10 min and was asked to give some autographs and photo ops. That was IT. He also claimed Nurmi and co had to leave a side door with security which is a BALD FACED LIE. I walked out the front door with that DT many many days and they waltzed, unescorted right past the media trucks to their cars.

It's disturbing to me to read these bald faced LIES reported as fact.

Oh and Kiefer was one of the few media I went up to (before I realized how far he'd gone with his bias) reporting the ALV approach on Sam thing and he sneered at me "what do you want me to do, have her arrested?" and of course NEVER reported on it yet caused a lot of trouble talking to her "friend" about her "ER visit". He was totally sympathetic to her. Ugh, it all makes me ill. I know way more but gonna stop myself now.
 
IIRC the stipulation was that Jodi did not have a weapon in her hand when this photo (an already-admitted exhibit) was taken. Nothing more.



GAWD the biased inaccurate "journalism" on this case...arrrgh!

Kiefer's story day after the verdict reports how a photo was admitted showing Arias in Travis eye reflection "vaguely" showing her standing there without a knife or gun but camera in her hand.

Just because the State stipulated to her not holding a gun/knife when she shot that photo does NOT mean that photo demonstrated that. It was just as easy a "dog with a stick it's mouth" a "mexican chihuahua" or a "gopher" or Alyce Laviolette and her buck teeth for all I know . But to report that as "FACT"...that the photo showed this?

He's lost his damn mind.
 
I'm sorry. This will be such a tough weekend for you. I hope you reach out to your friends and other loved ones. Please don't isolate this weekend. Tight hugs for you.

Hugs chijojo......come here on Mothers Day. We will not ever replace her, but we will give you love and hugs

All WS's will be there for you....
 
i think she tried to take a plea because she didn't want all the bad things about HER coming out. its all about jodi remember :facepalm:

She wanted a plea so she could get a lighter sentence. Wanting to protect Travis is a joke. She claimed on Wednesday she didn't want everything to come out, yet she calls him a hypocrite and a pedophile in the same interview.
 
Yeah, and??? It probably was a big deal for his career. That is his job as a journalist. I don't fault in him at all. In fact many other journalists have expressed jealousy that he got it. People watched it. They were glued to it. So, to take it out on him, in my opinion is just hypocritical.

Everyone who is criticizing him, is also glued to the interview. So what does that say? Peeps don't want to admit that they are glued to her. Just like CA. It used to aggravate the crap out of me with the same stuff. picture after picture of her. I hated it, and didn't want to look at her.

Just like how everyone here claims to despise her, yet page after page peeps keep posting pictures of her I don't get it. Pick one. Seriously.

I'm not faulting him. Just explaining why he was so soft on her...he manipulated her right back I think.

I suspect she picked him because he is SERIOUSLY handsome and comes across as a really nice guy (one she probably thinks she can manipulate somehow).
 
I think she's just pizzed.

Just like with Travis....it wasn't that she couldn't live without him...she was pizzed that he could live without her.

JMO

Wow - what an amazingly astute comment. I think that pretty well sums up the persona of JA perfectly!

Thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
172
Guests online
1,640
Total visitors
1,812

Forum statistics

Threads
605,659
Messages
18,190,489
Members
233,487
Latest member
Eppomoosha
Back
Top