Aggravated waiting for the aggravation phase #5

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
After watching it several times, I'm not sure I can make out "Troy" but it does look like she says "interview." I had thought they couldn't know as they'd never allow it but then, they'd probably never allow a client to Tweet during a trial and she did that. It kind of makes me feel sorry for them, to be so impotent.

I know he wont but I'd love for Nurmi to write a book about it and call it '10 days out of 10' .. I bet they have horror stories to tell after years of dealing with her. Perhaps they've just given up on her altogether. I would have.
 
We can agree or disagree on the DP in the great USA and individual States here, but if there was ever anyone that deserves to be on Death Row for the rest of her life, it is JA. Some folks say, ah, just give her life in prison where she can manipulate everyone and have freedom like drawing carp and making money off of it and oh, just let her have LWOP so that she can manipulate people in jail and have a good life. LWOP is what JA wants. We cannot give that to her. JMO
 
So, her attorneys DID know she was doing this interview. Why would they allow it?

The only thing I can think is that they advised her against it and she said she wanted to do it anyway.
 
Nurmi looked vulnerable? To me it doesn't matter given how he tried to decimate the most vulnerable being here- a dead and sadistically murdered Travis who was rendered voiceless.

I understand the seeing of it, but the fact is Nurmi chose to smear a helpless victim. Like I care now about Nurmi's supposed vulnerability. It doesn't even begin to compare to Travis' which Nurmi doesn't mind blacking and erasing.

Just reporting what I saw. As in he knew the First degree conviction was coming in. No confidence left at all that day. Just calling it as I saw it.
 
She's not lying about the "catholic priest" photo. It's too tame to be a lie. But the stuff about the bruises are definitely lies, especially her claims about a phantom man who witnessed all these bruises. How convenient that she can't name him. Trying to track him down would be like trying to track down a real Easter Bunny. That's why Nurmi didn't waste his time. And LMAO about her friends and siblings who witnessed all this abuse!!! Let me get this straight, Nurmi wasted the court's time to call Lisa to the stand for the sole purpose of testifying about an email involving sex, called Daniel Freeman to the stand to testify about a verbal argument that he started, but didn't bother to call these witnesses to physical violence for his own reasons? I think we know why, Jodi. It's lies.

how would you know if she was not lying about the photo, its no more out there than any of the other lies she told, and if it was true nurmi would have put that pic up every day, just like he did playing the phone call

I do think she is describing some gag photo that really existed. I was reading Travis' Myspace comments the other day, and one of them said something to the effect of, "Don't be chasing any little boys." It was obviously a joke but I didn't know about what. I think this might be it.
 
The only thing I can think is that they advised her against it and she said she wanted to do it anyway.

Unfortunately, it was her right to do that interview. She can do more as long as she is not on restrictions by the Sheriff's dept.

Who knows whether her DT encourages her to do it or discourages it?
 
I know he wont but I'd love for Nurmi to write a book about it and call it '10 days out of 10' .. I bet they have horror stories to tell after years of dealing with her. Perhaps they've just given up on her altogether. I would have.

God, can you imagine? For the last 2 years their lives have been Jodi, Dr. Samuels and ALV. Wonder how many times they've woken up screaming.
 
Just reporting what I saw. As in he knew the First degree conviction was coming in. No confidence left at all that day. Just calling it as I saw it.

I surely can relate to seeing the 'vulnerability'. And how dangerous that can be in effect.
 
I do think she is describing some gag photo that really existed. I was reading Travis' Myspace comments the other day, and one of them said something to the effect of, "Don't be chasing any little boys." It was obviously a joke but I didn't know about what. I think this might be it.

If the picture is how she described it, the defense team would have proudly paraded it around the courtroom like the maid costume. They didn't. There has to be a reason for that.
 
Actually the Paul Rudd lookalike juror looks way more like Adam Levine ..he's super thin and mostly wore sweats to court including the day of the verdict. But we stuck with Paul Rudd anyway. ;)
Appreciate the update! I only knew him as the Paul Rudd-lookalike. Whether he looks more like Adam Levine than Rudd, it sure seems like FCA thought she had worked her "magic" on Juror No. 7. Oh well. ;)
 
She's not lying about the "catholic priest" photo. It's too tame to be a lie. But the stuff about the bruises are definitely lies, especially her claims about a phantom man who witnessed all these bruises. How convenient that she can't name him. Trying to track him down would be like trying to track down a real Easter Bunny. That's why Nurmi didn't waste his time. And LMAO about her friends and siblings who witnessed all this abuse!!! Let me get this straight, Nurmi wasted the court's time to call Lisa to the stand for the sole purpose of testifying about an email involving sex, called Daniel Freeman to the stand to testify about a verbal argument that he started, but didn't bother to call these witnesses to physical violence for his own reasons? I think we know why, Jodi. It's lies.

So this is the opinion for fomenting lies about Travis.

If there is no concrete evidence, what makes it true? I see a massive lie given this is merely an opinion.
 
Wow .. it does not take long for these girls in jail on the doco to turn lesbian no matter how 'straight' they are going in!
 
I finally was able to watch the full interview. It was amazing how much the tiny bit of editing stole so much from the narrative. I was so taken by her own hypocrisy, not only from the sexual/religious side, but the blatant media attention seeking aspect. Realllllly? Juan is seeking the limelight? How can she say that in an interview with a straight face and not see the irony? What a softball interview. Yet i understand he needed to do that in order to get her to talk to him. She really is a freak of nature. Another fascinating part that had been edited in the previous snippets doled up on Fox was the advice for victims....document, document. Not report, or get out, or change yur life...just document....yanno, so you can beat a murder rap. I was also blown away at her statements that she has no mitigating factors. Sheesh, this evil creature is mind boggling. Seriously mind boggling.
 
Appreciate the update! I only knew him as the Paul Rudd-lookalike. Whether he looks more like Adam Levine than Rudd, it sure seems like FCA thought she had worked her "magic" on Juror No. 7. Oh well. ;)

He wore a wedding ring...I think people were more concerned with "The Wrestler", juror 12 who never concerned me. I think he wrote at least one of the "sarcastic" questions. He was from what I saw "the leader of the pack" of the 4-5 pack on the back. I always read him as a GUILTY juror.
 
She's not lying about the "catholic priest" photo. It's too tame to be a lie. But the stuff about the bruises are definitely lies, especially her claims about a phantom man who witnessed all these bruises. How convenient that she can't name him. Trying to track him down would be like trying to track down a real Easter Bunny. That's why Nurmi didn't waste his time. And LMAO about her friends and siblings who witnessed all this abuse!!! Let me get this straight, Nurmi wasted the court's time to call Lisa to the stand for the sole purpose of testifying about an email involving sex, called Daniel Freeman to the stand to testify about a verbal argument that he started, but didn't bother to call these witnesses to physical violence for his own reasons? I think we know why, Jodi. It's lies.

So this is the opinion for fomenting 'truths' about Travis.

If there is no concrete evidence, what makes it true? I see a massive lie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
239
Total visitors
368

Forum statistics

Threads
608,475
Messages
18,239,952
Members
234,385
Latest member
johnwich
Back
Top