I think Jodi will push too far and either Donovan will get into trouble or get disgusted with her. Jodi stops at nothing to get her way.
I think the dog has some foul gas going on so candles are being lit to cover the odor. :floorlaugh:
CMJAA tweeting about being persecuted by hln.
three-hole wonder...
Triple shackled, ankles chained, hands handcuffed to waist chain, with stun belt:rockon: Very pleasureable to visualize. Eventually she will look forward to it, means it's time for 1 hr. out of her cell. Then the body check on return:floorlaugh:
Sorry I see posts eluding to ARSONIST convicted at that....she actually freaks me out. And her makeover only freaked me out MORE! That's JA's one and only friend, lmao! What a hoot.
Quick OT Prayer request.
My oldest DD and her tribe ( hubby included) are moving back in here - we do have a garage apt but it has to be reframed in. That will take a few. And there is no kitchen in there. So Please prayers that we can make this work for the next 2 years until she graduates.
Carry On.
I think you are exactly right. She knew this would be the last chance to get in the last word in an interview she controlled. I hadn't looked at it quite that way before.
Out of hand? Not hardly - more like having fun with it, you should try it, its nice!
:floorlaugh:
I answered this a good while ago so don't remember the date of the Minute Entry but it was several months ago. In essence, she refused to plead remorse for something "she did in self defense"... motion was tabled until after the verdict... but I don't know which PHASE.
Candle number 3..
what.did.this.dog. EAT??
:stormingmad:
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
OMG I took it like the dog ate a candle, too.
Thank you, oh great and wise Hopeful One for setting me straight. :floorlaugh:
Did the Vivarin work?:doh: where are my southern manners, :seeya:Good Morning fellow sleuthers :angel: During the break I've been taking care of things that got neglected during the trial like throwing out all the molded stuff in the fridge :facepalm:, washing clothes that had started to put off a particular o-dor, returned all my phone messages, replied to numerous emails, spoke to my family and well, you know :blushing:
OT: My daughter, who is always harassing me about being on WS all of the time, suffers from debilitating migraines. So, the other day when she had another migraine come on I told her that my WS friends who suffer from this shared that Vivarin and room temperature pepsi/coke works the best for their migraines (mind you I had already went out and stocked the medicine cabinet with the vivarin) my daughter said FINE, I'll try anything at this point.
A short while later in my sweet caring and motherly voice :giggle: said honey did the vivarin help? :angel: It was priceless!:dance: with a big ol' :yesss:
Rundown of today, described above. Seems to be confusion here, so this is what I understand to be the sequence. Clarification/correction requested.
My understanding is that the prosecution presents its argument in the aggravation hearing and then the jury decides if aggravation was proven.
The mitigation hearing is the defense's argument in this phase of the trial. The defense attempts to show if there were mitigating factors that might warrant a lesser sentence.
"The defense team's mitigating evidence is presented during the penalty phase of the trial, after the prosecution's aggravating evidence. Juries are instructed to consider both sets of factors, but not simply to count the number of factors on each side and determine the sentence based on whether there are more aggravating or mitigating factors. Rather, jurors are expected to use their own judgment in deciding which factors carry greater weight. If the aggravating circumstances are stronger, jurors may choose a death sentence, but if the mitigating circumstances are more compelling, they must choose a life sentence." (source: http://www.capitalpunishmentincontext.org/issues/mitigation
Next would come the victim impact statements and then the jury decision regarding sentencing. If the sitting jury cannot arrive at a unanimous decision regarding the death penalty, another jury will be seated. If that second jury still cannot unanimously agree to the death penalty, sentencing is left to the judge to decide with the death penalty off the table.
Don't know what my Airedale, Katie, ate..but oh my gosh!! I am lighting a candle in hopes of being able to stay in the same room as my laptop. Dogs follow me everywhere (Mindy Lab is Sam's companion dog, but hangs with me when nurses are here).
Poor Sam will have to watch court today..no nurses, no choice.
Lighting second candle..
BBM. Sure, what's not to like? World class photographer, Nouveau-Reanaissance artist, legal savant, Ciceronian-class orator, hairdresser to the stars, oscar-worthy actress, undiscovered supermodel, ninja master, special forces class survivalist, computer hacker extraordinaire, living nativity expert, animal behaviorist...