Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think she just wants to continue to stretch the boundaries of her conditional release. She began the moment she got out and I doubt she will let up any time soon. Prison did nothing to reduce her entitlement attitude. I don't care whether she works or not, if that is really what she is going to do. I think it is just an excuse to be places she isn't supposed to be. She is slippery, like a snake, and is always trying to slither her way around the rules.
Mechele and her husband have both posted new entries on the Free Mechele blog. Dr. Linehan's entry is here.
Here's Mechele's entry.
I'm happy to see she will be posting court documents and other information on her website. I'm very interested in seeing information we haven't gotten to see through mainstream media.
I don't know how many black people reside in Anchorage and potentially might be on the jury but racist words in rapper slang are NOT a good look. But you see that is Mechele, she will do what she wants when she wants and say what she wants, irrespective of the fact that her own words could once again potentially have an affect on her new trial. Some people can't and won't change and I suspect Mechele is one of them.
This is all very interesting! It makes sense that they should be monitoring posts on discussion boards at the very least to see which way the wind is blowing. I also think it gives them some idea of which issues may be of concern to potential jurors. My own reading of these boards is that the majority of people who post believe she may be guilty but that her supporters are emotional and resistant to logic, standing very fast in her defense.
I was wondering about allowable testimony in the upcoming trial. Can Carlin IV refuse to testify as Judge Volland seemed to suggest? If so, cant he be subpoenaed? If he cant be forced to testify, can his testimony in the first trial be introduced? (Logic and fairness would suggest that isnt possible to me.) Are interviews he gave to news organizations regarding the gun allowable?
Would the same hold for the Carlins taped interviews where he states he thought his gun was involved, that he got rid of it and that he didnt trust Mechele? Or would the fact that he cannot be cross examined by the defense preclude this?
This is such important testimony it would be a problem if it cannot be used.
Wow Nancy you have made some great points and kudos to you for weeding out the BS, that is for bull shiz - not for Barbara Sheridan, that is continually posted by Mechele and her supporters.
I have no problem with either of them actually. If they believe she is innocent fair dues to them, I don't share that opinion, however she is getting a new trial and technically she is innocent until that plays out.
Now to her twitter account. Nancy as all your (go you good thang!) sleuthing has proven, it is Mechele's twitter account end of story! Even without your info I would still know that it is her account due to her sentence structure, spelling mistakes, content etc. If Mechele or her supporters don't want that information public then set it to private. Maybe she likes the attention, who knows? I don't know how many black people reside in Anchorage and potentially might be on the jury but racist words in rapper slang are NOT a good look. But you see that is Mechele, she will do what she wants when she wants and say what she wants, irrespective of the fact that her own words could once again potentially have an affect on her new trial. Some people can't and won't change and I suspect Mechele is one of them. They believe their own hype and correct me if I'm wrong but I think psych eval's showed she was narcissistic....that I DO believe. Having known a true narcissist in my time they are a fascinating study if you don't allow yourself to be pulled in.
As to all the working malarkey and running out for a pint of milk - sheesh!! Girl you are on trial for murder, want to think about that for a moment? I say keep her behind in the lock down put in place already and if she wants that to change she can bloody well cough up the dough for anklet monitoring. I have no doubt whatsoever that she is a flight risk and I will be very surprised if her restrictions are relaxed. Once again she is on trial for murder not some sort of white collar crime, you think by now she might get this but not Mechele. I guess it means nothing to me if she does get the restrictions relaxed and is allowed to work but for Kent's family I'm sure they would be pizzed to the max.
And here we are again, the victim who is deceased has NO rights and the person alleged of the crime does. It is a sad indictment on society. I wonder if she spares a thought for Kent while she is gorging herself in cheese heaven and making vacuous comments on twitter? I think not. Sorry if I sound mad here but I am. I guess the conundrum for me is that if you are innocent then why shouldn't she do all these things? The problem is though is that she has often behaved in an inappropriate way and I do believe it is ALL about Mechele.
A word about John Carlin, I suspect the tragedy in his life was meeting Mechele in the first place. This man seemed to have done quite well up until that point. This is where things really took a turn for the worse, his divorce notwithstanding. Whether John was guilty or not guilty he certainly paid a high price for his decisions and mistakes and I am still not convinced that he was guilty, in which case his death in prison is one of the few tragedies in this story, Kent's is the other.
Lastly, Mechele does not read things about her on the internet? Really? LOL
Biggest load of bull dust I have ever heard! I would bet my last nickel that Mechele googles herself constantly and has her eyes on all the forums, she reports back to the supporters and they do the pooh poohing. Of this I have no doubt. She has the time and the energy and has been diagnosed as a narcissist.
Twitter account - check
Facebook account - check
Cruise the internet for me me me - check
Okay this is a long post for me and I know that I have missed talking about many things that Nancy brought up but I have to leave it here.
Nancy you are one of the best posters on websleuths and I am so glad you are here and keeping an eye on this case. God willing, you and I, flourish, marilhicks and all the other fine posters I haven't mentioned (can't remember all your names my apologies) will still be around and posting at the trial. We will be able to see and hear all the evidence and if she is found guilty again, watch her go back to jail.
Sorry, last comment, if any of Kent's family read here then please know that there are some people out there who do care about your son and do care that he gets justice. We do think of you, the family, and the son you loved and lost Kent.