ConnectedSuitor
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 153
- Reaction score
- 0
Was this for his DUI? Or is my timing off?
Yes, it was for the DUI.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was this for his DUI? Or is my timing off?
Thicker. We have had two weeks of daytime temps above freezing, and we are up to 12+ hours of daylight.
This time, Bartenfeld got the request from Anchorage to help on the Koenig case Friday night, and was told "we need you now." By Saturday, they were mobilizing.
Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2012/04/03/2406095/details-in-koenig-case-remain.html#storylink=cpy
This is a quote by the LA FBI dive team member that supervised the recovery operation. If they knew about the body's location to know they needed a sophisticated dive team's assistance Friday night, and they took the shed at 10:00 pm Friday and examined it Saturday, IMO they didn't get the body location info from the shed. What is in the shed?
My thoughts and opinions only.
Lol omg you're so sweet! I only know as much as everybody else that was on this since the beginning. Seriously. Some people are good at pulling court records, some good at genealogy, some at past residences, some at networking, others at old business, some at traveling endeavors we all share. Literally.
The reason I know he's not a lost boy is bc some of his family have social networking profiles that he looks exactly like. Plus his sister's testimony was just shared with me recently and it pulled alot of the pieces together as to why their family was moved from NY when they were younger.
This is a quote by the LA FBI dive team member that supervised the recovery operation. If they knew about the body's location to know they needed a sophisticated dive team's assistance Friday night, and they took the shed at 10:00 pm Friday and examined it Saturday, IMO they didn't get the body location info from the shed. What is in the shed?
My thoughts and opinions only.
This is a quote by the LA FBI dive team member that supervised the recovery operation. If they knew about the body's location to know they needed a sophisticated dive team's assistance Friday night, and they took the shed at 10:00 pm Friday and examined it Saturday, IMO they didn't get the body location info from the shed. What is in the shed?
My thoughts and opinions only.
It's possible, but discussing it in your posts is not permissible.Bessie, if you happen to see this... Is it possible to share genealogy privately with a group of others as long as it won't be posted? It will alleviate confusion about his name. Thank you.
Here's the rule on sleuthing family members:Inviting outside contact or alluding to "private" additional information:
Inviting is termed as a post where you invite other members to contact you to find out more information, rather than post it in the forum. This is not allowed and any posts with emails or invitations to contact for more information will either be edited or deleted entirely. This includes use of the Private Message system via comments such as Check your PMs or PM me posted in discussion threads. Think about it - it's like whispering into someone's ear while you are at a table full of other people. If you want to have a private conversation just have it, don't announce it. Additionally,please don't drop hints or post on the board that you know something or are privy to inside information but you won't or can't post it.
If you can't post it, don't.
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65798"]Rules Etiquette & Information - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]...Additionally, sleuthing family members that are not suspected of being involved in the crime or disappearance is not allowed. Don't make random accusations or post personal information (even if it is public) like parking tickets, address, or first and last names of all their relatives and their neighbors. Also, never "bash" or attack them, or accuse them of involvement. However that does not mean that family members cannot come into discussion as the facts and issues of the case are discussed.
a little OT, but IMO
I don't think that if Ik is mormon he would be living with native americans, as they are "bad people and stained brown until they convert."
"Mormons believe that Native Americans are related to a lost tribe from Israel. That tribe, came across the ocean about 600 B.C. to America, led by an otherwise unknown Jewish prophet named "Lehi."
Mormon doctrine claims that Lehi's children eventually became two warring factions, which included the good, white Nephites and the bad, brown Lamanites. The Lamanites, eventually killed all the Nephites by 500 A.D. But the bad, brown Laminates continued to live on and are now called Native Americans. "
The Book of Mormon originally stated that when Lamanites converted they would then become "white and delightsome."
Is anyone surprised that after 2 months missing, SK was deceased? The first few hours after an abduction are the most critical hours. After that, the percentage of returned safely/unharmed is dramatically reduced.
I know a lot of hope was held out, but after the first few days, I think police knew this was not going to have a good or happy outcome.
Sadly most cases go this way.
I am surprised she is dead and discarded in a frozen lake, because days before Keyes was arrested, the police flat out said "we believe she is alive and have no reason to believe she is dead"
snipped from ADN article:
By CASEY GROVE
Anchorage Daily News
Published: March 9th, 2012 07:44 AM
Anchorage police have reason to believe that missing 18-year-old Samantha Koenig is alive, according to a detective investigating her apparent abduction about five weeks ago.
Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2012/03/08/2360227/police-say-they-believe-samantha.html#storylink=cpy
I believed the police.
For some reason I genuinely believed that we had a better shot of finding her alive than some other cases. I didn't follow this case too closely so I probably just skimmed and was (obviously) terribly incorrect. I was surprised to see her found dead and heartbroken not only for her, but also for her dad/family and friends.
I still don't understand the mystery about online presence- or lack thereof-
why was Samantha's FB and online existence obviously scrubbed?
I believe they pretty much always say that unless they have proof to the contrary. They would never want to say they believe someone is dead and have them turn up alive. And perhaps they were hoping that IK had kidnapped her for ransom since his interest seemed to be on getting money. It is rare that LE will say they believe someone is deceased without proof. I believe at that time they simply did not know if she were dead or alive.