I’m another one who doesn’t have Twitter, so I’m missing the relevance of whatever Carlee had posted.
I’ll just say for now, that IMO if there were either an unescorted child by a busy highway, and/or kidnappers of a woman, certain things would be incumbent upon the police.
In the interest of the child’s safety, the police, IMO, would have to have issued an alert for that child, or else reassured the public that the child has been located unharmed.
In the interest of the public’s safety, it would be mandatory for the police, having interviewed Carlee, to issue a BOLO with description of this kidnapper or kidnappers.
To my knowledge, this has not been done. Therefore to me this original story has less credence.
I am still 100% on Carlee’s side, though. I’m just relieved she is safe and then whatever we find out will be fine. Just that it’s imperative that the info comes from a NEUTRAL source, such as the police. Not from anyone who has a vested interest in Carlee’s explanation.
JMO until more NEUTRAL and OFFICIAL confirmation is released.