Found Alive AL - Carlethia “Carlee” Russell, 25, 911 call reported toddler walking on side of interstate, car found, she & toddler gone, Birmingham, 13 Jul ‘23 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Carlee's last few twitter messages on the day she went missing are interesting. If it's true that the last one was posted just 15 minutes before the incident, it's extremely interesting and relevant, in my opinion.
those 3 tweets were all after she got off work and before she disappeared.

i agree. they are interesting and relevant. i'd bet investigators probably feel the same way.
 
Thank you so much! This is not Carlee's words, but the words and interpretation of the dispatcher and assumed to be Carlee's report, so I can see how articles could shorten descriptions and what not.

And 3-4 years old is not my version of a toddler, so that is definitely worth noting. By the time a kid hits 4, they aren't toddling much.
 
Last edited:
Let's say that your theory is correct that this wasn't an abduction. What are your thoughts on how she evaded police considering they show up on camera within 4 minutes?
my theory would be either 1) she goes into a nearby home OR 2) someone is waiting with a car on the other side of those trees.
 
Direct quote:

"Carlee communicated on her cell phone with individuals known to her while on her path of travel up to the point of calling 911 at 9:34 PM. The conversation with the 911 operator ended and Carlee called a relative. She went missing during that conversation sometime after 9:36 PM after telling both the 911 operator and the relative she had seen a male toddler in a diaper on the side of I-459 and was stopping to check on him. Traffic camera footage was obtained which depicted this portion of the incident, and that footage is still being analyzed as part of the investigation in conjunction with the 911 call to accurately determine the timeframe. Carlee’s 911 call remains the only timely report of a child on the interstate."
I don’t know why this bothers me, but how would anyone know that a toddler they saw in a diaper on the side of the road was a male?
 
The police dispatcher clearly says Mile Marker 10. Yet all the pictures that keep getting posted here just as clearly show Mile Marker 11. Wonder why?
She traveled quite a distance before stopping (that still has me wondering). She may have noted she passed mile marker 10 and had not yet got to 11 when she called 911?
 
The police dispatcher clearly says Mile Marker 10. Yet all the pictures that keep getting posted here just as clearly show Mile Marker 11. Wonder why?
Because that's where her car finally came to a full stop, and where she got out, just before mile maker 11.

But if she thought she saw a child at mile marker 10, IN THE DARK, why in the world get out of the car a mile away, and ask the "child" if they were okay?

Are we to believe that child ran along the side of the highway and stopped at mile marker 11 where she stopped and got out?

Nope. Just nope. Sorry but, all the nopes on this one.
 
Thank you so much! This is not Carlee's words, but the words and interpretation of the dispatcher and assumed to be Carlee's report, so I can see how articles could shorten descriptions and what not.

And 3-4 years old is not my version of a toddler, so that is definitely worth noting. By the time a kid hits 4, they aren't toddling much.

Nor still wearing diapers, typically.
 
I’m another one who doesn’t have Twitter, so I’m missing the relevance of whatever Carlee had posted.


I’ll just say for now, that IMO if there were either an unescorted child by a busy highway, and/or kidnappers of a woman, certain things would be incumbent upon the police.

In the interest of the child’s safety, the police, IMO, would have to have issued an alert for that child, or else reassured the public that the child has been located unharmed.

In the interest of the public’s safety, it would be mandatory for the police, having interviewed Carlee, to issue a BOLO with description of this kidnapper or kidnappers.

To my knowledge, this has not been done. Therefore to me this original story has less credence.

I am still 100% on Carlee’s side, though. I’m just relieved she is safe and then whatever we find out will be fine. Just that it’s imperative that the info comes from a NEUTRAL source, such as the police. Not from anyone who has a vested interest in Carlee’s explanation.


JMO until more NEUTRAL and OFFICIAL confirmation is released.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
2,643
Total visitors
2,723

Forum statistics

Threads
599,921
Messages
18,101,611
Members
230,955
Latest member
ClueCrusader
Back
Top