Dhighsmith
SouthGA
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2017
- Messages
- 633
- Reaction score
- 5,151
From my brief research and there’s probably recent decisions to question my opinion but in general courts dismissed jury misconduct claims that the Internet usage is prejudicial to defendant. Courts find there’s no outside influence in juror Internet activity. The courts don’t approve of jurors Internet actions and will most times replace that juror but they refuse to grant mistrial or toss out jury conviction.
QUOTE="Blacklist, post: 18391123, member: 237921"]
In Re: July 17th Post-Trial hearing.
12 Subpoenas were filed/requested late yesterday by the Defense Counsel. I will not post the actual subpoenas or names out of WS and personal policy. However I can state that all persons subpoenaed were not any of those that were subpoenaed or publicly connected to the original trial.
It is an obvious assumption that these potential witnesses are connected to the allegations of juror misconduct. Social media or otherwise.
Stay tuned folks.
Justice On Friends!!!
[/QUOTE]
QUOTE="Blacklist, post: 18391123, member: 237921"]
In Re: July 17th Post-Trial hearing.
12 Subpoenas were filed/requested late yesterday by the Defense Counsel. I will not post the actual subpoenas or names out of WS and personal policy. However I can state that all persons subpoenaed were not any of those that were subpoenaed or publicly connected to the original trial.
It is an obvious assumption that these potential witnesses are connected to the allegations of juror misconduct. Social media or otherwise.
Stay tuned folks.
Justice On Friends!!!
[/QUOTE]