crhedBngr
Justice for Danielle Stislicki
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2015
- Messages
- 5,868
- Reaction score
- 49,514
Anyone else noticed they ruled out the west side of the neighborhood?
Interesting.
JMVHO.
Anyone else noticed they ruled out the west side of the neighborhood?
Father'sDo we know if the aunt is the mother's or father's sister ?
Anyone else noticed they ruled out the west side of the neighborhood?
If she has a burner phone with data, she can look up routes.
Well..if you really look at what she said, I’m not so sure.
This part, yes: “If she ran away, which I don’t think she would – she’s not like that“
But what about this part: “just come home,” pleaded Annie Chao, Allison’s mother. “It’s going to be okay. I just want to make sure that you’re safe.”
That sounds like something you say to a kid who ran away doesn’t it??
Not incoherent at all … I found it quite insightful. I think you make some excellent points/observations, and I agree w/you.It is still odd to me how quiet, relatively, LE has been about this.
I’m no longer sure the statement about no threat to the public means anything. I think that sometimes it is intended to mean there’s no boogey man snatching up every child on the street, and the threat level is the same as it always has been, and not that whatever happened, Allison is the only one it will happen to.
IF hypothetically, big if, Allison’s father or father’s side of the family was suspected (by LE) of being involved or somehow hiding Allison, would LE be reacting the way they are? I mean, I don’t think we know if there is actually a custody agreement, but I would assume that, at the least, it would be custodial interference if Allison is not with either of her parents. And I would assume that if the whereabouts of her father were unknown (such as if he left with Allison) that that would be public by now.
It doesn’t seem like Allison’s mother suspects that, as she’s not throwing blame (my inference from her statement is she’s walking the fine line of not blaming him while also not being a united front) and she has been pursuing the surveillance camera angle, which IMO doesn’t seem like something you’d do if you believe your ex took her.
The idea that the father’s side is involved just doesn’t make sense to me. If it was something planned, why send her off riding on her bike by herself? If she ran away to a relative’s, why report her missing? Reporting her missing gets LE involved immediately and creates a lot more future legal trouble than, for example, telling her mom that Allison wants to stay with her father’s side for a while, and making it a more common custody issue.
Apologies if that was incoherent, I’m just having trouble wrapping my head around this and getting the words out.
The sighting from the news report was described as College Ave in El Cerrito