marlywings
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2012
- Messages
- 12,282
- Reaction score
- 145
We don't know what's in the financial records of the company that owns the house. MSM ( which Makara has confimed, thanks ) suggests GBC and Allison were directors and that Allison was removed as a director and company secretary following her death. This is usual practice but perhaps for different reasons than this situation. Probably GBC remains as sole director. Legally any personal power of attorney that he has given would not allow the attorney to make decisions or sign documents for the company or him in his capacity as a director. There would have to be a power of attorney by the company itself appointing say OW to sell the house. Wonder if they stuffed up there! Could be an avenue for overturning the sale.
We don't know what interest Allison's family had in the house. Did they lend money to the company to help fund the purchase? If they did then it would usually appear in the financials of the company as loans owing to them. They are then unsecured creditors of the company. Selling the house doesn't change the obligations of the company to its creditors or to its shareholders. We also don't know what other connections this company had to their other companies, they may all be intertwined and moneys may show in the financials as owing between companies. Also if any of the companies are trustees for trusts then that complicates it as well.
Now that Mr Dickie is administrator of Allison's estate, GBC through OW and his lawyers will have to co-operate with him to answer all these questions re the sale of the house as Allison's estate appears to have an interest as shareholder and maybe also creditor. If it has been sold at less than market value then that raises big concerns that will no doubt be addressed. Sounds like a contract has been signed but it probably hasn't settled yet. I expect Mr Dickie's lawyers will be wanted the proceeds of sale if the contract goes through to be frozen, probably in a lawyer's trust account or even paid to court if he has to make an application to the court, pending determination of who is entitled to them.
BBM
Yes the settlement wasn't for another three weeks according to this morning's report....
September 6, 2012 - 8:13AM
On Tuesday ... I spoke with Mr Zampech by telephone. He confirmed to me that an offer on the property was accepted.
He mentioned that settlement was in approximately three weeks, but was unable to give me any further information due to client confidentiality.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/que...ents-reveal-20120905-25ee1.html#ixzz25fBOthGq