FergusMcDuck
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Messages
- 481
- Reaction score
- 1,194
sure coreced.. lol
she was in an evil european country.. what if she wasnt in europe ..
Are western countries immune against police malpractice? That is certainly not something supported by history.
what would happened to the poor rich girl
I love how she's now been upgraded to "rich". Like, middle-class in Seattle isn't exactly uncomfortable, but wealthy she ain't.
she wasnt accused of ANYTHING but they forced her to frame a male
this isnt a hollywood movie.. this is life
They forced her to sign off on the theory they had decided on. They didn't frame her, they were just overconfident and deluded. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
you say she was forced to frame an innocent male ( which the police know nothing of )
They had Amanda's depositions and the phone records. There is no way they didn't know who Patrick Lumumba was.
and maintain that for two weeks ! lol
no court beileved this joke..only her fans do
It's weird how some folks try to make this into some kind of team sport.
here is some facts to refresh ur mind
about this evil police fiction
1. Police provably kept open minds, and did not immediately suspect Knox though her odd behaviors were hard to miss, or treat her differently than others with possible useful facts.
This isn't true. Amanda was deposed multiple times and she was the one they dragged to the downstairs apartment search, despite her not being particularly close to them.
2. She was not the only one with possible useful facts told to stay in Perugia for several days; others were told they might be needed again; no others complained.
How do we know the others didn't complain? The only reason we know Amanda complained is that the police put her private conversations out there. Yet even while complaining, she stayed and helped the police for hours upon hours, days upon days, without a thought of getting a lawyer, and without a clue that she was a suspect.
3. There is no documented investigator prejudgement of guilt, even at her fourth and final quite short session on 5 Nov when the subject was provably once again listing more visitors to the house.
I wouldn't call being pulled into an interrogation room at 22, then not released until 6 "short".
4. She was never tag-teamed by a dozen police, and she signed every page of all four session reports which named the mere several officers who were there.
Well, if the police (more than one of which were later convicted of abusing their office) say so...
5. There was no 50 or more hours of sessions. No session lasted from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am. All four of her sessions over 4 days combined may not have exceeded that length of time.
That's not true. The total time spent with the police over those days exceeded 50 hours.
6. The fourth and final session on 5-6 Nov was unplanned, and when she turned up late on 5 Nov and was told to go get some sleep, she insisted she wanted to remain.
That's not what Giobbi said. He was very clear that they were both meant to have been brought in for interrogation that night.
7. All four sessions were recorded and she signed. She was never threatened or called a liar; her conniption when shown a text message on 5-6 Nov happened spontaneously and very fast.
That's not true. The final session (at the very least) was not recorded, as is well known considering they had to make excuses for it.
8. On 5-6 Nov 2007 Sollecito also u-turned - and blamed Knox! No tag-team there. Knox never confessed; she made a false charge of murder against someone else, allowed to stand for several weeks.
Not true. She withdrew the accusation the following morning, and again the next day. It's not her fault that Mignini, deluded by his theory (linked to above), refused to do anything about it.
9. She did not simply claim she was with Sollecito that night; under no pressure she repeated several times in writing that she went out and all courts allowed that. Sollecito said she did too.
10. After she broke she was told several times she should not talk further without an attorney. No questions were asked of her after that but she pressed on.
That's not true. Mignini arrived after the first declaration was signed, and further questions led to the second declaration. Mignini's claim that she just sat there until she "spontaneously" declared some extra things that would be useless to her (but useful for the prosecution) doesn't pass the smell test.
11. She had a translator at all four sessions, though she herself chose to speak in Italian now and then. She made and handed over notes in Italian.
A translator who worked for the police and acted in that fashion.
12. At trial she confirmed she was provided with refreshments and helped to get some sleep. She was never refused bathroom breaks and confirmed she was not hit.
In that case it was terribly wrong of Mignini and the officers to charge Amanda with calunnia for her claims that she was mistreated. I suppose that means their loss was well deserved.
any true crime discussion starts with the victim ..not the other side around
do I believe that any of you care one bit about this poor girl ? no I dont
I care about facts and truth.
sorry then this is pointless.. its like going against stans
my last word ..is that fine they can buy innocence and fame and victimhood too..money buys everything
What money? The mortgage on their house? There's this odd factoid floating around that Knox was rich and it is just not true.
it doesnt buy peace.. and I firmly belive that meredith soul is hanging over them..thats why they act the way they do..
erratic is a simple way to describe it
If Meredith's soul is floating around out there, I suspect it has better things to do.