Linda7NJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 32,110
- Reaction score
- 8,279
Yes. So I find it ridiculous that people use the kitchen knife in their reasoning for why Knox and Sollecito are guilty. I find it strange that many of the people who claim they are guilty BARD never mention the incompetence of the police.
First, they were required to record Knox's interrogation but did not, so all we have to go on is their word. The investigators had tested the luminol footprints for blood and found them lacking, a truth carefully hidden from December 17, 2007 (when they were collected) until September 2009, when defense expert Sarah Gino outed the negative test during the trial that led to Knox and Sollecitos conviction. Even now bloody footprints are the Knox cases most persistent urban legend. Honestly, that is grounds to have the case thrown out and clearly corrupt.
At any rate, after going through many sources last night, I chalk this up as a witch hunt and I am even less convinced that Knox and Sollecito were complicit. I do not even think the courts really believe that they are guilty since they are not making any moves to lock Sollecito up and you think they would if they actually believed he and Knox stabbed Meredith over complaints of a messy room or a sex-game-gone-wrong.
Here's the beauty of the Italian system as I see it. It's not enough to claim the footprints aren't blood.
One must also use logic and reason to come up with another alternative plausible explanation. Were the footprints glowing from luminol because Amanda had a mashed horseradish foot mask on her feet that night or morning? No. And no other reasonable conclusion can be made. It was blood, attempts were made to remove that evidence. It's a sound reasonable conclusion to draw because it's the ONLY ONE that makes sense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk