I am attaching an article that gave me a lot to think about. It's author is a man named Jim Snowden. I don't know much about him other than the fact that he has authored a couple of books, writes a blog (from which this article is excerpted) and has come to the conclusion that AK and RS are probably innocent. Therefore, I readily admit that I can't vouch for his credibility. Nevertheless, the article (it won't take you long to read) seems fairly well reasoned and brings up ideas about which I was only peripherally aware. I'd be interested in hearing your opinions about the piece.
[www.jimsnowden.com/2014/01/20/the-unsinkable-rubber-ducks-of-italy/[
From the article:"Meredith Kerchers death involved several events which had to combine to result in her murder in her bedroom. So it is sensible to start with the place where her body was found and work outward, following the strongest evidence, and see how it converges."
I can find no evidence that testing for bloody foot prints or clean up of same was done in Meredith's bedroom. If someone can correct me on this, please do. I can understand if at the beginning they believed the prints in the bedroom matched Sollecito's shoes; but after those had been matched to Guede's and the police went back to use the super sensitive luminol in the hallway, did they really not do the same in Meredith's bedroom?