I was just reading this post from Oct. 2013, around a month ago, and once again, the same argument is made about MK's DNA being found vs not found as amounting to conviction/acquittal, respectively.... I really cannot wait to read Wednesdays court hearings, and then at the end of the month, the ruling. The spin is making things seem all but over, or unreal.....:facepalm:
http://allthingscrimeblog.com/2013/...t-may-hinge-on-dna-evidence-on-butcher-knife/
ETA I guess we have already gone over this and clarified it; I just find it difficult to have faith in this process finding the truth. I guess it sounds "mystical", but if Knox and Sollecito perchance really are guilty - and I waver back and forth on this - wouldn't it have been providential to have MK's dna found in the sample? As in, "it was meant to be", etc.