Conti and Vecchiotti
wrote, "but we cannot accept the conclusion stating that the genetic profile is compatible with the hypothesis of a mixture of biological substances (presumably flaking cells) belonging only to Raffaele Sollecito and to Meredith Susanna Cara Kercher insofar as, from what has been explained above, a mixture is present in which several contributors of male sex are present (a circumstance supported by the electropherogram relative to the Y chromosome, where several alleles are clearly present which, despite being particularly evident, were not taken into consideration by the Technical Consultant);"
Elsewhere in the report they
wrote, "The genetic profile thus derives from a mixture of unidentified biological substances (it will be recalled that no test was performed with a view toward revealing the presence of flaking cells, and so the claim is without scientific basis), whose larger component is represented by the DNA of the victim and whose smaller component is represented by DNA from several individuals (cf. autosomic STRs) of male sex (cf. Y chromosome), of which one of the Y haplotypes corresponds to the Y haplotype of Raffaele Sollecito."
Anyone who sees the peaks in the egrams can conclude that DNA is present. Yours is a strange interpretation of what they wrote.