Anita Rose, 57, walking her dog, police investigating suspected murder, Brantham, Suffolk, 24th July 2024'

[Luwin]

Crimestoppers £20k reward for Brantham murder inquiry help

The reward is being offered to anyone who can provide "key information" in relation to the investigation.

www.bbc.co.uk

Crimestoppers is offering a £20,000 reward for anyone able to offer "key information" in a murder investigation.
Philip Breckon, Crimestoppers regional manager, said Ms Rose's family deserved "answers and justice".
"We know it can be difficult for some people to speak directly to the police, which is why our charity is here for you," he said.

"We’ve been passing on information about crime while guaranteeing anonymity since we were established decades ago. It’s a promise we’ve always kept."

Crimestoppers' reward is available for three months and will expire on 3 January next year.

"You may think your information is insignificant, however, it could make all the difference," Mr Breckon added.

 

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1844749831606039004

 

[slowpoke]

If they’re still looking for information, what of those three people that were arrested earlier, and out on bail:

1) A 45-year-old man from Ipswich on suspicion of murder

2) A 37-year-old woman on suspicion of handling stolen goods

3) A man in his 20s on suspicion of murder

What led the police to these individuals? I can guess that maybe her phone was found through a Find My IPhone type of feature, and that is what the 37-year-old woman was in possession of. (Not confirmed at all by LE. Just me guessing.)

Yet, they’re still asking for the phone’s case, along with the jacket. IF the woman was found to have Anita’s phone, I wonder what explanation she gave for Anita’s phone case not being on the phone? Or, if not the phone, what other “stolen goods” is she accused of handling?

MOO

 

[Dotta]

If they’re still looking for information, what of those three people that were arrested earlier, and out on bail:

1) A 45-year-old man from Ipswich on suspicion of murder

2) A 37-year-old woman on suspicion of handling stolen goods

3) A man in his 20s on suspicion of murder

What led the police to these individuals? I can guess that maybe her phone was found through a Find My IPhone type of feature, and that is what the 37-year-old woman was in possession of. (Not confirmed at all by LE. Just me guessing.)

Yet, they’re still asking for the phone’s case, along with the jacket. IF the woman was found to have Anita’s phone, I wonder what explanation she gave for Anita’s phone case not being on the phone? Or, if not the phone, what other “stolen goods” is she accused of handling?

MOO

I guess
Police have no strong evidence linking the victim to these 3 people.

Because
why are they on bail?

The woman could always say she found the phone,
or bought it cheaply from somebody at the flea market.

It seems that there is no DNA of perp/s on the victim.

Police try to find some witnesses obviously.
Or informers,
hence the reward.

( I view a reward as a last resort.
But I might be wrong )

JMO