LaborDayRN
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2012
- Messages
- 11,500
- Reaction score
- 52,106
When the homeowner has lost his/her property and the tenant (the woman who lived there) has lost every last item that she owned (thankfully not her pets) and now has to find a new roof to put over her head I see no reason they should not be made whole financially.That's what Heche's insurance is for. Hopefully she has a fantastic policy.
Although, imo, if the woman is made whole...
Does anyone ever not go to litigation anymore? No wonder our court system never comes close to catching up. MOO The woman's home will be rebuilt. She and her dogs made it out alive and uninjured. Does anyone ever just thank their lucky stars and let that be enough? MOO
If their insurance doesn't cover everything (which happens quite often) or the tenant doesn't have rental insurance that covers it, I don't see any reason that filing a law suit against the person who caused it would not be considered. It may be settled during litigation (I would hope so) but if not, IMO that's what the courts are for.
Last edited by a moderator: