Anthony`s volunteer fingerprints-Potential case being built against them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 37334
  • Start date Start date
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Asking for immunity before charges are filed that he claims aren't even intended? That's what JB tried to do for Casey and look how well THAT worked out. Obviously, as in Casey's case, charges are pending.
 
Nathisha Lance: Nothing is coming down the pike for the Anthonys at this point.
 
Originally Posted by Janis396
Weren't the Aisenberg's (5 month old Sabrina) busted by hidden bugs and surveillance in their home when their baby disappeared?


Absolutely.

"The charges were dropped after a judge questioned the way law enforcement officials went about collecting evidence, particularly secret recordings from the couple’s home that prosecutors said were incriminating but that turned out to be largely unintelligible.

A federal judge ordered the government to pay the Aisenbergs $2.87-million in legal fees. At the time, Peluso was a federal prosecutor who argued that Cohen’s firm should get only $250,000."

Source:http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20081215080519145
 
HUH? If the A's admit that Casey is guilty they will be throwing her under the bus? And if they don't, they are covering for her. No matter what they do, they can't be right in some people's eyes.
Cindy started lying at the onset (June 9th). Since then, the truth from this family has been sparse to nonexistent, imo. Instead of covering for Casey perhaps their involvement is far more than what people imagine it to be. I don't think anyone would consider asking for immunity unless their involvement is directly involved with the crime and punishable with more than a fine or a slap on the wrist. This is a capital murder case and they are sitting squarely in the middle of the crime scene. They have plenty to fear from the prosecution, imo.
 
Hold on. You read that wrong.:confused:

I was simply wondering what their intentions were for asking for immunity: ie)ready to tell LE what they know, if anything, regarding their granddaughters disappearance.


That is what I meant.

Thanks for the explanation. Apparently we simply have different interpretations for the term "throwing someone under the bus" . I take it to mean betrayal or backstabbing.
 
Smart move. I wonder why MN never thought to do that. This new attorney really seems to be on the ball.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that MN did do this and much more. The problem was that CA was not ready to listen and she wanted to do things her way. However, now she is faced with a reality she can not ignore and she can not spin. It appears at this point, GA might be taking the upper hand. MN specifically said that he resigned because the A's would not listen nor heed his advice. They were not ready. CA could not give in. However, I would venture to guess that with the discovery, the wind has been knocked out of CA's sails and we are going to see GA step up to the plate and become the driving force in this family throughout the trial. Of course, this is all speculation on my part.

I think that it is not uncommon to see role reversals in couples or families that are under a lot of stress. This past six months has been hard on the A's and the next six months to a year is probably really going to test their sanity. I think we will see (at least I hope and pray that we will see) GA, CA and LA pull together and become a united front against the garbage that is going to get slung throughout the trial process. KC is going to be looking for a scapegoat and we have heard rumblings that she has already slung dirt at both her father and brother. It is not going to get better as we watch KC really start slinging to save her azz. I think CA is recognizing that she can not control what is coming and GA is getting stronger in CA's weakness which is allowing GA to insist that they follow the very good advice of the new attorney.

I firmly believe MN is a very good attorney and a compassionate man and I believe he advised them well. They just were not ready to accept what was staring them in the face.

Salem
All just my opinion and speculation, of course :)
 
I think I am going to sit back and see where this all filters to... just too many people with too many things to offer up are going to the airwaves and saying this, and that... it is getting kind of hard to figure out who is involved in the case and who is just speculating on the case, in all of these interviews. *sighs*
 
Originally Posted by Janis396
Weren't the Aisenberg's (5 month old Sabrina) busted by hidden bugs and surveillance in their home when their baby disappeared?




"The charges were dropped after a judge questioned the way law enforcement officials went about collecting evidence, particularly secret recordings from the couple’s home that prosecutors said were incriminating but that turned out to be largely unintelligible.

A federal judge ordered the government to pay the Aisenbergs $2.87-million in legal fees. At the time, Peluso was a federal prosecutor who argued that Cohen’s firm should get only $250,000."

Source:http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20081215080519145
All LE needs is a judge to give them the ok to bug the house. I'm sure OCSO have done so, and will not make the same mistakes that the cops made in the Aisenberg case. And I'm absolutely positive the recordings will be totally intelligible this time around! :)
 
Originally Posted by Janis396
Weren't the Aisenberg's (5 month old Sabrina) busted by hidden bugs and surveillance in their home when their baby disappeared?




"The charges were dropped after a judge questioned the way law enforcement officials went about collecting evidence, particularly secret recordings from the couple’s home that prosecutors said were incriminating but that turned out to be largely unintelligible.

A federal judge ordered the government to pay the Aisenbergs $2.87-million in legal fees. At the time, Peluso was a federal prosecutor who argued that Cohen’s firm should get only $250,000."

Source:http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20081215080519145

Ooh that turned out waay bad. I didn't follow that case only the bits and pieces. I certainly hope if there are listening devices placed or utilized they have been done so with the utmost care and with the utmost scutiny of the courts. So as not to have a situation as you have described above. I went and did a little research, boy, that couldn't have turned out any worse huh?
 
As I have been posting in another thread, to a point where I may be babbling :D

I believe the A's have left the territory of Obstruction (misdemeanor) and have strolled into the valley of Criminal Accessory after the fact. (felony).

jmho:)

:blowkiss: Hey stranger. You could be right!
 
From your link: Attorney Brad Conway also said he is representing the Anthonys for free.

What is it about this family that inspires people to work for free???? I don't get it. There are so many people who truly need help in this world. :mad:

Yeah, I know... publicity. GMAB.

At least he is being honest about it whereas the "others" aren't so forthcoming about it.

I guess negative publicity is better than no publicity ...... sad.
 
If the Anthony's are charged I will not be surprised at all.

I'm actually surprised that they haven't been charged already.

They have lied to LE on several occasions.

They both have given contradictory statements to LE.

They have intentionally mislead LE with the intent of protecting a murder suspect

They're withheld valuable information that would have been critical to this investigation.

They intentionally destroyed evidence that may have been used to convict their daughter or may have even been used to help locate Caylee.


Enough is Enough....!! Charge them both ...!! Throw the Book at them...!!

I get sick to my stomach when I think of Cindy baking Casey brownies while Caylee sat in a trash bag right around the corner from their house.
 
I will be very interested in all that was removed from the home. It has been speculated that JB was taking letters back and forth...I wonder if there were any in that house that were taken into evidence. This is all just speculation but it would be interesting to know.

Wow, that would be golden!
 
At least he is being honest about it whereas the "others" aren't so forthcoming about it.

I guess negative publicity is better than no publicity ...... sad.

You know that's true, so far as I can recall he is the only one that has stated anything about how the fee's are being covered.
 
Cindy started lying at the onset (June 9th). Since then, the truth from this family has been sparse to nonexistent, imo. Instead of covering for Casey perhaps their involvement is far more than what people imagine it to be. I don't think anyone would consider asking for immunity unless their involvement is directly involved with the crime and punishable with more than a fine or a slap on the wrist. This is a capital murder case and they are sitting squarely in the middle of the crime scene. They have plenty to fear from the prosecution, imo.

SS, take me from the begining, June 9th. Start there with your theory. I can't take it anymore...I try and put it together and something jumps in the way..I respect your insight and now I want to know all of it. I can't take bits and pieces anymore, I'm almost bald from pulling my hair out trying to figure out everyones theories.Please.
 
I hope it's bugged too...it's probably the only way to find out what really happened to little Caylee. The A's are helping KC cover up what she did. It's so sad!

Back when LP was in the house, I was hoping the house was bugged....IMO, kc murdered Caylee, the ants are guilty of tampering with slacks, knife, other stuff in car, cleaning car, not calling LE, LA tampering with computer, things at BF house??? Was their a dress on baby doll? Did CA remove it and not kc??? I hope the ants are charged with all the lies and waste of money they cost Orlando LE. :behindbar
 
The game changed when a body was found. There was no need for MN to make any kind of overture like this, because there was no body. Considering the body was found so close to the house and potentially there is evidence in the house George and Cindy own linking to the body, I can see why now is the appropriate time to look for such an "immunity."

While I think I like this new attorney, he's jumping the ball a bit, IMO. Lots of focus here on obstruction of justice, and the whole argument for charging someone with it from a legal perspective is pretty grey. Look at how much Casey lied to investigators, pointed them on the ZG path and then promptly shut up -- you'd think she would have been charged with such a thing before anyone else is.

She was. Way back in July when she was first arrested. While the child neglect charges were dropped in favor of the homicide charges, I believe the lying to police ones still stand.
 
Cindy started lying at the onset (June 9th). Since then, the truth from this family has been sparse to nonexistent, imo. Instead of covering for Casey perhaps their involvement is far more than what people imagine it to be. I don't think anyone would consider asking for immunity unless their involvement is directly involved with the crime and punishable with more than a fine or a slap on the wrist. This is a capital murder case and they are sitting squarely in the middle of the crime scene. They have plenty to fear from the prosecution, imo.

Asking for immunity suggests that the A's have been forwarned of pending charges. IMO. Asking for immunity suggests the A's have more to divulge. IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
190
Guests online
305
Total visitors
495

Forum statistics

Threads
609,299
Messages
18,252,232
Members
234,599
Latest member
Shayolanda
Back
Top