mysteriew
A diamond in process
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
- Messages
- 23,811
- Reaction score
- 815
This makes no sense. If all they are worried about is obstruction charges, they should know that they would likely receive nothing more than a slap on the wrist. Esp considering that a persuasive argument could be made that desperate people do desperate (and stupid) things. Including but not limited to trying to keep one's child from being charged in a capital case. Furthermore the atty stating "for the next interview they give to authorities, there will not be any conflicting statements," while asking for "full immunity," as opposed to stating "for the next interview they give to authorities, they will tell the truth." speaks volumes. From where I sit, this is not about avoiding obstruction charges. It is about avoiding something much deeper, much darker. Otherwise put, afaics, granting "full immunity" to these people for a more rehearsed and cohesive lie would be entering into a fool's bargain. Besides, LE has done a fine job untangling this mess, in spite of the plethora of lies and dramatics emanating from that household.
I agree, the way this is going down I am thinking more serious charges are being proposed. Something like accessory after the fact or something.
Since LE hasn't stated what charges they are considering, I am thinking they are allowing themselves some wriggle room. Something like threatening accessory but being willing to reduce to obstruction. And this latest release from the attorney is a counter saying they will stick to what they have so far unless the prosecution agrees not to charge them. IOW the attorney is trying to bargain with their testimony at KC's trial.