Dotta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2021
- Messages
- 12,905
- Reaction score
- 78,624
Morgan's dna got him once. I doubt his dna was ever entered into codis, and hes dead now, so theyd have to exhume him in order to get itDNA got him once
Of course, you’re right. I’d help fund digging him up for a sample.Morgan's dna got him once. I doubt his dna was ever entered into codis, and hes dead now, so theyd have to exhume him in order to get it
Morgan's dna got him once. I doubt his dna was ever entered into codis, and hes dead now, so theyd have to exhume him in order to get it
Morgan's dna got him once. I doubt his dna was ever entered into codis, and hes dead now, so theyd have to exhume him in order to get it
Beautiful.They have his mother's DNA, voluntarily given.
I WAS WRONG, I misread, it was Morgan's mother that gave DNA, please forgive, I am very tired.Beautiful.
We’d all volunteer to help. He doesn’t deserve peace, even in death.I WAS WRONG, I misread, it was Morgan's mother that gave DNA, please forgive, I am very tired.
So yeah, let's dig him up, I'll fetch my spade.
I still believe that he had an accomplice who might have been the man that the kids saw, assuming that it was not a red herring.Anyone have Lincks arrest record and his former home addresses? just in case he somehow was able to go back to any of those places and bury her body.
This is merely a theory, but I believe it is plausible that the individual described by the children may have interacted with them or with Morgan on that night as he passed by. It’s conceivable that he said something to them, which could have left an impression. After this interaction, they might have observed him walking towards Linck’s truck in order to access his own vehicle. Due to this observation, they may have mistakenly assumed that Linck’s truck belonged to him. Consequently, this led them to conclude that he could be the person responsible for abducting Morgan, simply because they saw him in proximity to Linck’s truck.I still believe that he had an accomplice who might have been the man that the kids saw, assuming that it was not a red herring.
Well I guess we will know eventually. I imagine LE will be showing the (former) child witnesses photos of Lincks from the time and re-questioning them in light of this news.This is merely a theory, but I believe it is plausible that the individual described by the children may have interacted with them or with Morgan on that night as he passed by. It’s conceivable that he said something to them, which could have left an impression. After this interaction, they might have observed him walking towards Linck’s truck in order to access his own vehicle. Due to this observation, they may have mistakenly assumed that Linck’s truck belonged to him. Consequently, this led them to conclude that he could be the person responsible for abducting Morgan, simply because they saw him in proximity to Linck’s truck.
This would be nice to know. As others up thread have pointed out, it’s not likeAnyone have Lincks arrest record and his former home addresses? just in case he somehow was able to go back to any of those places and bury her body.
Who knows, he could have has a son or accomplice lure them to the vehicleI had recently seen the 'Still Missing Morgan' doc and it's just so weird how the kids' recollection of the man who took Morgan doesn't at all seem to fit a 67-68 year old man. But on the other hand, it was dark, he was wearing a cap, and they were just little kids.