Argentina - Loan Peña, 5, went orange pick w/fam, shoe found, local police chief arrested, as well as others, Nueve de Julio, 13 Jun 2024

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Loan's grandmother's cell phone: 34 deleted calls and strange activity. The 86-year-old woman organized the lunch where Loan was last seen. Catalina recorded 13 calls, between 11:56 and 13:30. Macarena Peña arrived at 10:41, with her sister, Loan, and José. Laudelina was already there because "she had gone to cook."

For this reason, the activity of the device is strange and unusual, since, according to the expert report, the woman communicated with people who were already in her house.

Communications Before Loan's Disappearance.

The first on the list is outgoing: she called “victoriac” and the conversation lasted 2 minutes and 24 seconds. At 12:30, she dialed Loan’s parents, José and María Luisa Noguera and spoke for 40 seconds. This number was not in her address book.

Two minutes later, at 12:32, he had a connection with Caillava, which lasted one second. Then, she called Caillava again which lasted eight seconds. One minute later, an outgoing call to José/María, lasting three seconds. The conversation was cut off and resumed for three seconds, at 12:34.

At 12:36, she called Benítez. The document does not specify how long this contact lasted, but it states that at 12:38 she recorded a two-second communication with José/María. At 12:40, she recorded an outgoing call with “victoriac” lasting two seconds, a duration that is repeated at 12:40. Then, at 12:58, she contacted Laudelina, for 47 seconds.

At 13:00, another call to Caillava lasting 2 minutes and 31 seconds. At 13:08, another connection was recorded with José/Maria lasting 22 seconds, which was repeated at 13:27, lasting one minute and 41 seconds.

Finally, there is an outgoing communication lasting almost two minutes, at 1:30 p.m., to a number that is not saved.

At 2:25 p.m., Laudelina receives the first warning from Benítez: Loan had been lost.

Communications after the disappearance​

At 16:12, Catalina's cell phone was used again, with an incoming call from a cell phone, from a Buenos Aires line, lasting 9 minutes and 25 seconds. Two hours later, at 18:02, she called Benítez for three seconds. At the same time, she records an outgoing call with Diego Peña lasting just over four minutes, which she resumed at 18:08 and 18:12, without the report specifying the duration or whether it was carried out.

The experts marked as “interesting” the six calls to the subscriber in the name of Noguera (also used by José) at 12:30; 12:33; 12:34; 12:38; 12:39 and 13:08. At the same time, they highlighted the two calls with Benítez at 12:36 and 18:02. The call to the Laudelina line, at 12:58 and the contacts with Diego Peña. Finally, the connection at 13:30 stands out.

 
The experts marked as “interesting” the six calls to the subscriber in the name of Noguera (also used by José) at 12:30; 12:33; 12:34; 12:38; 12:39 and 13:08.

Was Catalina talking to Jose who was already there? Did he even have a cell phone? Or was she talking to someone at Loan's house, like one of his older siblings? Pretty sure its not Loan's mom because they supposedly didn't get along.
 
Loan's grandmother's cell phone: 34 deleted calls and strange activity. The 86-year-old woman organized the lunch where Loan was last seen. Catalina recorded 13 calls, between 11:56 and 13:30. Macarena Peña arrived at 10:41, with her sister, Loan, and José. Laudelina was already there because "she had gone to cook."

For this reason, the activity of the device is strange and unusual, since, according to the expert report, the woman communicated with people who were already in her house.

Communications Before Loan's Disappearance.

The first on the list is outgoing: she called “victoriac” and the conversation lasted 2 minutes and 24 seconds. At 12:30, she dialed Loan’s parents, José and María Luisa Noguera and spoke for 40 seconds. This number was not in her address book.

Two minutes later, at 12:32, he had a connection with Caillava, which lasted one second. Then, she called Caillava again which lasted eight seconds. One minute later, an outgoing call to José/María, lasting three seconds. The conversation was cut off and resumed for three seconds, at 12:34.

At 12:36, she called Benítez. The document does not specify how long this contact lasted, but it states that at 12:38 she recorded a two-second communication with José/María. At 12:40, she recorded an outgoing call with “victoriac” lasting two seconds, a duration that is repeated at 12:40. Then, at 12:58, she contacted Laudelina, for 47 seconds.

At 13:00, another call to Caillava lasting 2 minutes and 31 seconds. At 13:08, another connection was recorded with José/Maria lasting 22 seconds, which was repeated at 13:27, lasting one minute and 41 seconds.

Finally, there is an outgoing communication lasting almost two minutes, at 1:30 p.m., to a number that is not saved.

At 2:25 p.m., Laudelina receives the first warning from Benítez: Loan had been lost.

Communications after the disappearance​

At 16:12, Catalina's cell phone was used again, with an incoming call from a cell phone, from a Buenos Aires line, lasting 9 minutes and 25 seconds. Two hours later, at 18:02, she called Benítez for three seconds. At the same time, she records an outgoing call with Diego Peña lasting just over four minutes, which she resumed at 18:08 and 18:12, without the report specifying the duration or whether it was carried out.

The experts marked as “interesting” the six calls to the subscriber in the name of Noguera (also used by José) at 12:30; 12:33; 12:34; 12:38; 12:39 and 13:08. At the same time, they highlighted the two calls with Benítez at 12:36 and 18:02. The call to the Laudelina line, at 12:58 and the contacts with Diego Peña. Finally, the connection at 13:30 stands out.

$64,000 question: was the grandmother in possession of her phone?

Easy for someone who didn't want to use his own phone.

JMO
 
$64,000 question: was the grandmother in possession of her phone?

Easy for someone who didn't want to use his own phone.

JMO

Why $64,000?!?

Let's say, hypothetically, most of the family are involved and they all did it for money or for some kind of gain.

Would Loan Pena really have needed to be reported missing at all if the family decided to sell him
?
 
Why $64,000?!?

Let's say, hypothetically, most of the family are involved and they all did it for money or for some kind of gain.

Would Loan Pena really have needed to be reported missing at all if the family decided to sell him?
But Loan's parents have 7 other kids I believe. Would all those kids and Loan's mother AGREE to sell Loan to traffickers? I cannot believe that. IMO
 
But Loan's parents have 7 other kids I believe. Would all those kids and Loan's mother AGREE to sell Loan to traffickers? I cannot believe that. IMO

Maybe not all, but I was thinking more along the lines of the older ones (gran, uncle, aunt, dad) more so than his brothers (some maybe). Not his mother.

But if his dad and gran were in on it and let's say one or two older brothers then why report it?

Surely it could have been done without any media attention.

Don't get me wrong, I don't want to think that they are involved either, not at all. That really would be like a nail in the coffin.

Hypothetical only.
 
Maybe not all, but I was thinking more along the lines of the older ones (gran, uncle, aunt, dad) more so than his brothers (some maybe). Not his mother.

But if his dad and gran were in on it and let's say one or two older brothers then why report it?

Surely it could have been done without any media attention.

Don't get me wrong, I don't want to think that they are involved either, not at all. That really would be like a nail in the coffin.

Hypothetical only.
I guess that was my point but I didn't really clarify---what I meant was if the younger siblings and the mom weren't involved, then th4ey'd definitely want to report him missing.

I don't believe Loan's dad is involved either. At least I hope not/

I think maybe his brother or sister, maybe his older sons?
 
Last edited:
I guess that was my point but I didn't really clarify---what I meant was if the younger siblings and the mom weren't involved, then th4ey'd definitely want to report him missing.

I don't believe Loan's dad is involved either. At least I hope not/

I think maybe his brother or sister, maybe his older sons?

Who was the first to report Loan missing to the police?

Do we actually have that information.
 
Without checking I *think* it was his father, but I am really just guessing. I have a feeling it hasn't been said who reported?
IIRC, it was one of the ladies that is now under arrest?

Doesn't really specify except that it was Loan Pena 's family.


"Loan’s family reported his disappearance to the police. Although it was initially treated as a missing person’s case, federal authorities later began investigating his disappearance as a possible case of child trafficking."

Link Below:
Missing 5 Yr Old (29th June, 2024).
 
What I recall is that Jose, Loan's dad, borrowed the neighbor's phone to call his wife and then she came over to help look for Loan. Caillava was the one who volunteered to call the police after she went home and they called and said couldn't find him and would they look in their car (after her and Perez stole him IMO). Everyone thought he was just lost at first, so no need to call the police if they can find him. Laudelina's phone was inoperable because she didn't have any minutes left on it.
 
Last edited:
Agents specializing in cybercrime found an alarming conversation in the cellphone records of Laudelina Peña's daughters. In it, one asks the other: "And what happened?" To which the receiver responds with an audio that has since been deleted.

Detectives are trying to recover it, as they consider this evidence essential to learn more details about what happened that afternoon and where Loan could have been taken. Universal Forensic Extraction Device (UFED) software will be used to recover the voice message.

 
The Judge lifted the secrecy of the summary today in the case. “It's not surprising because it was due today,” a key investigator in the case told this newspaper. The judge must therefore decide within ten days the situation of the seven detainees in the case, currently locked up in various prisons such as the federal penitentiaries of Güemes, Salta, Resistencia, Chaco, Marcos Paz and Ezeiza. They are Victoria Caivalla, Carlos Pérez, Walter Maciel, Laudelina Peña, Mónica Millapi and Daniel “Fierrito” Ramírez. All of them are accused as co-authors of the alleged abduction and concealment of the minor.

The judge will have to decide whether to prosecute them, dismiss them, or declare them lacking merit based on the available evidence.

 
The courts have lifted the gag order in the case investigating the disappearance of Loan Danilo Peña. Starting Tuesday morning, lawyers can log into the system and access the file of the case being handled by federal judge Cristina Pozzer Penzo. In addition, it was learned that the judge summoned the two Corrientes prosecutors who began the investigation to testify. The judge will ask Juan Carlos Castillo and Guillermo Barry to explain why they changed the case from disappearance to recruitment.

 
Grandmother Catalina broke her silence in an exclusive interview with TN journalist Paula Bernini. The examination of her cell phone revealed numerous deleted communications. Catalina denied having been the one to delete the calls. Asked if there was a possibility that she had spoken to someone that morning, Catherine replied: “Those days before it may be, but not that day. Because I hadn’t gotten up yet and Laudelina had already arrived with her daughter, who had to cook. Then the others came. Laudelina arrived at 7:30, I get up at 8. I keep my phone under my pillow when I go to bed, so when I wake up I look at the time. And that morning I must have taken it out to charge the battery .”

When asked if someone could have taken her phone. Catalina replied: " Yes, because here they don't pay attention, they do what they want." She flatly denied having made 13 calls on the day Loan disappeared: "I might make one call a week," and concluded by saying: "I didn't delete a single call, I don't know how to delete calls. I make the call, I dial the numbers and I make the call. But I don't know how to delete, I don't know how to delete."

 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
194
Guests online
2,146
Total visitors
2,340

Forum statistics

Threads
600,969
Messages
18,116,281
Members
230,990
Latest member
DeeKay
Back
Top