Arizona girl, 2, left in car by father on 109-degree day and is found dead

[Tower]

At first I thought, how dumb that cars shut off automatically, for emergency situations like this. What if someone were to accidentally lock a child or pet inside, and it takes a while to get help or break a window?

But then when looking up info about these features, I realized they’re probably in place to prevent carbon monoxide poisoning.

I wonder which way would save more lives.

It’s a very interesting question, but I have heard of cars being accidentally left on inside the garage and slowly poisoning people inside the house. If you accidentally locked a baby or pet inside, presumably you’d call for help and try to break the window. 20 minutes would be plenty of time. Unless you’re doing something deliberately stupid and unsafe like this father. The car is only protecting you against accidents, not deliberate acts.

 

[ErinC]

Dozens of Kids Die in Hot Cars Every Year: How Good Intentions and Faulty Memory Can Create Disaster

On average, nearly 40 children die in hot cars every year – and while many assume this kind of tragedy can only happen to “bad” parents, experts explain to PEOPLE how stress and sleep factors can wreak havoc on memory and lead to disaster.

people.com

I remember reading about this car death case when it happened. Dad accidentally left toddler in car when he went to work. As soon as he found the baby, he ended his life.

Tragic story. Obviously one of the hundreds we read about. I find his reaction more understandable than texting my spouse saying Sorry Babe.”

I agree- this poor gentleman, I truly believe forgot. His reaction is IMO far more along the lines of what one would expect. Even if a parent didn't commit suicide, I would expect them to be a complete basket case. Not "Sorry babe, but you did the same thing too you know!" I know that not everyone responds in the same way to similar situations, but there's a point where that just doesn't cover the situation at hand.

 

[airportwoman]

It’s a very interesting question, but I have heard of cars being accidentally left on inside the garage and slowly poisoning people inside the house. If you accidentally locked a baby or pet inside, presumably you’d call for help and try to break the window. 20 minutes would be plenty of time. Unless you’re doing something deliberately stupid and unsafe like this father. The car is only protecting you against accidents, not deliberate acts.

There was a case like that in my region some years back. ISTR that a van was parked in an attached garage, and was left running because some people were listening to a CD. (Like I said, it was a while back.) Seven people died; the 23-year-old mother of the two children who died (and a third who was elsewhere) was also a widow, although she and her husband were separated at the time of his death just months earlier.

Coroner: Carbon monoxide caused 7 deaths

Preliminary autopsy results showed that the seven people found dead inside a duplex apartment in Kirksville, Mo., over the weekend suffered carbon monoxide poisoning, the coroner said Tuesday.

www.nbcnews.com

There was another case from the region, more recent, where a father, also separated, was found in a car with his two young children, all deceased, but the wife said he was a very severe Type 1 diabetic and probably passed out due to low blood sugar. Apparently the autopsy backed this up; the children weren't old enough to let themselves out, go inside, and call 911.

 

[mickey2942]

I have seen several other situations lately in the news where mothers left their children in the car, actually intentionally, to go shopping, the children were rescued alive, and these women were charged. One was out on bond, the other ROR.

Mother arrested for allegedly leaving kids in hot car while shopping

The mother of the children was at the scene and claimed she did not realize how long she was in the store.

news4sanantonio.com

Elyria mom charged after young kids left alone in hot car in Westlake: Bodycam

A Westlake mother was charged after police say she left a 2-year-old and a 4-year-old in her hot car.

www.cleveland19.com

Their children were not even dead! And here we have a father, who did intentionally leave the victim in the car, with evidence that he had done it previously. And the victim died, on a scorching hot day. And he goes home to be with the witnesses, the other siblings. That is just crazy. I wonder if they asked him about their little sister, where she was...

 

[LifeIsAMystery]

I have seen several other situations lately in the news where mothers left their children in the car, actually intentionally, to go shopping, the children were rescued alive, and these women were charged. One was out on bond, the other ROR.

Mother arrested for allegedly leaving kids in hot car while shopping

The mother of the children was at the scene and claimed she did not realize how long she was in the store.

news4sanantonio.com

Elyria mom charged after young kids left alone in hot car in Westlake: Bodycam

A Westlake mother was charged after police say she left a 2-year-old and a 4-year-old in her hot car.

www.cleveland19.com

Their children were not even dead! And here we have a father, who did intentionally leave the victim in the car, with evidence that he had done it previously. And the victim died, on a scorching hot day. And he goes home to be with the witnesses, the other siblings. That is just crazy. I wonder if they asked him about their little sister, where she was...

I think they SHOULD be charged, it would likely change their behavior and possibly deter others, but MOST OFTEN parents are NOT charged or if charged initially, charges are dropped.

MSN

In the case of this father, the MOTHER pleading with the court for him to be released and returned to the home likely made a huge difference. I am not convinced that was in the best interests of the surviving young girls, but JMOOO. They are not only grieving and traumatized (he had left them in the car repeatedly too) but they are witnesses for AZ and may be retaliated against and coached for having told LE about PS5. MOOO.

 

[LifeIsAMystery]

Nancy Grace covered this story tonight. Think it is ok to post?

 

[MsMarple]

Nancy Grace covered this story tonight. Think it is ok to post?

Thanks for the link! I found it interesting that the guest psychologist and the woman from Kids and Cars disagreed about whether this is a Forgotten Baby Syndrome case, although the Kids and Cars woman qualified her opinion by saying there isn’t enough information yet to make a final determination. However she did say it was not unlike other cases that have occurred so to me it sounds like she’s leaning towards Forgotten Baby Syndrome. IMO

The guest defense attorney predictably did a weird spin about the father saying things that weren’t true but not actually lying. Um, okay.

Nancy made the point that (I’m paraphrasing here) one can immediately regret the deed but it doesn’t negate the intent or frame of mind at the time of the incident, in reference to the letter of the law. She called it something like a malignant heart or abandonment of regard for human life. Interesting thought.

Anyway y’all can listen for yourselves; this was just my personal take on the report.

 

[MissMalowe]

It is possible he forgot about retrieving her from the car at *some* point I suppose, but- the problem (for both the defense and the prosecution) would be proving at what point EXACTLY did this transition from his purposeful & habitual babysitter on wheels situation to his unintentional "I got distracted and forgot she was still out there!" situation.
Was it shortly after he arrived home, after he put the food/groceries away? Was it an hour later? 2 hours? 10 minutes before mom arrived home? And how does that specific point in time relate to her time of death? Was she already dead once this transitioned from intentional to forgetful? Sometime after?

And by what means do you prove WHEN he actually forgot other than by what he claims/will claim? Would he even honestly be able to be aware now, looking back, of when that important transition occurred?

No point to this post really just brainstorming out loud....

 

[HawthorneJuniper]

I think she is being judged for her own actions and inactions knowing this was a pattern and knowing it had continued after she expressed concern, that is failure to protect. The kids had no one else to protect them. She then pleaded with the court and got him released back to the home immediately, which may or may not be in the kids' interests and may or may not impact the case.

If it was a hired caregiver no one would be defending a dynamic that allowed this pattern to continue IMHOO.

That’s how I view it. And also how actions would be evaluated legally. Parents/guardians have a legal Duty to Protect. Each parent/guardian has an individual duty.

And I’m certainly not holding her responsible & saying she breached that duty. But it’s her own language that raises that legal issue as a possibility .

“HOW many times have I told you…?” That’s what would determine whether she failed to protect. The circumstances around that. We already know the father failed.

 

[Arkay]

It is possible he forgot about retrieving her from the car at *some* point I suppose, but- the problem (for both the defense and the prosecution) would be proving at what point EXACTLY did this transition from his purposeful & habitual babysitter on wheels situation to his unintentional "I got distracted and forgot she was still out there!" situation.

Yes…his excuse is very challenging to prove.

Of course, it is SO much easier not to forget your baby in the car if you don’t INTENTIONALLY and HABITUALLY leave her there alone in the first place.

This wasn’t, IMO and based on all we have learned, a dutiful father who was absent-minded, or distracted, or had a change to his routine that threw him off.

This was a man who opted to leave her there as though the car were a crib or playpen. He CHOSE to do this and did it regularly.

I don’t think he intended her to die, but his DELIBERATE actions killed her. Hence negligent homicide or Murder 2, rather than Murder One.

IMO

 

[Angelcat13]

It is possible he forgot about retrieving her from the car at *some* point I suppose, but- the problem (for both the defense and the prosecution) would be proving at what point EXACTLY did this transition from his purposeful & habitual babysitter on wheels situation to his unintentional "I got distracted and forgot she was still out there!" situation.
Was it shortly after he arrived home, after he put the food/groceries away? Was it an hour later? 2 hours? 10 minutes before mom arrived home? And how does that specific point in time relate to her time of death? Was she already dead once this transitioned from intentional to forgetful? Sometime after?

And by what means do you prove WHEN he actually forgot other than by what he claims/will claim? Would he even honestly be able to be aware now, looking back, of when that important transition occurred?

No point to this post really just brainstorming out loud....

Sad to say, but you make some very good points that could be important in how the law is viewed/argued by both the prosecution and the defense.

 

[SMK777]

It is possible he forgot about retrieving her from the car at *some* point I suppose, but- the problem (for both the defense and the prosecution) would be proving at what point EXACTLY did this transition from his purposeful & habitual babysitter on wheels situation to his unintentional "I got distracted and forgot she was still out there!" situation.
Was it shortly after he arrived home, after he put the food/groceries away? Was it an hour later? 2 hours? 10 minutes before mom arrived home? And how does that specific point in time relate to her time of death? Was she already dead once this transitioned from intentional to forgetful? Sometime after?

And by what means do you prove WHEN he actually forgot other than by what he claims/will claim? Would he even honestly be able to be aware now, looking back, of when that important transition occurred?

No point to this post really just brainstorming out loud....

And in all of this, the standout point is that he’d made a habit of a dangerous practice: using the air conditioned vehicle as a babysitting station.

Regardless of what point in time he actually forgot about her being left in the car, the essential factor is that her being left there at all opened the possibility that she would be forgotten, or that the AC would shut off, and that this could prove fatal, which it did.

It’s sort of like driving drunk: you won’t necessarily have an accident, but you’ve opened the door to that.

 

[momsof3]

I'm not sure whether or not there was relationship overlap matters as much as his failure to pay CS, the possible link of that to SAH (no garnishable wages) even though he seemed to try to avoid key tasks of that role and that he was non-compliant with court orders or even attending hearings, such that multiple civil arrest orders were issued by the court.

It is not behavior that prioritizes needs or wellbeing of a child or shows respect for rules and authority, even when that leads to consequences. I think that non-appearance history may have played into him being kept in custody but for the ardent appeal of ES in the present case.

IME some people don't think rules apply to them and they act that out in multiple situations.

I still cannot get over the "Sorry Babe!" text re: a dead toddler. It's astonishing. As was his attempt to trash his wife to LE and her blind devotion to him with only the briefest display of anger over her dead 2 year old. I really worry about grief stricken young kids and their needs in the midst of this dynamic. JMOO, YMMV.

I also want to point out, with regard to his character and trying to stay within TOS by not sleuthing family members, that Christopher Scholtes is not and has not proven in the past that he is a stand up father in any way, shape or form with regard to his oldest child (as well as his youngest).

His first child is a minor (age available in family court records) whose mother is recently deceased (publicly available obituary). In most cases, the minor child would go to live with the other living parent - dad in this case - but it is clear that his oldest child, still a minor, is NOT living with her father, CS, after her mother died.

 

[NuttMegg]

Yes…his excuse is very challenging to prove.

Of course, it is SO much easier not to forget your baby in the car if you don’t INTENTIONALLY and HABITUALLY leave her there alone in the first place.

This wasn’t, IMO and based on all we have learned, a dutiful father who was absent-minded, or distracted, or had a change to his routine that threw him off.

This was a man who opted to leave her there as though the car were a crib or playpen. He CHOSE to do this and did it regularly.

I don’t think he intended her to die, but his DELIBERATE actions killed her. Hence negligent homicide or Murder 2, rather than Murder One.

IMO

At the risk of repeating myself, i say he checked out long before this. Resentment filled at his own lack, imo, of gumption, lack of need to support family. Pushing 40, never a job that we know of. Dead beat dad doesn't always only mean "refuses to pay child support", it also means not there for any of his 4 kids, Abandoned one, then responsible for death of the baby. So far severely damaging 2 of 4 and the other two will never be the same no matter how much their parents try to portray it as just fate that she died.
Men, especially, get bonus points for showing love for their kids, OH you're so lucky to have a hubby, a daddy like him! (a la Watts who murdered then stuffed HIS still warm babies into 20' tall crude oil tanks) Oh but he loved them so much, look at the pics!

Pics with the kids, yep, for facebook. Already CS abandoned (per posted papers Maricopa family ct.) one child who never got to know their baby sister. Or their 2 other younger sisters for that matter.

Who wants to go down in history as the guy who played video games for 3 hours while the baby died, and it was your fault. I bet the petitioner sueing him for child support for some 10-12 years could thave told a lot about him. Sad to hear upthread that she died.

Jmo

 

[MissMalowe]

Since we learned of those family court details awhile back, it's left an additional really bad taste in my mouth. I understand that parents who divorce or breakup and then transition to having 2nd/new families are going to almost by default have an unavoidable imbalance in the amount of time, attention and resources that are spent on their new family vs their previous child(ren) since they live full-time with their new family and aren't having to split custody of their new child(ren) with anyone else; but it appears this dad's situation is.....more like a write-off and complete start over vs a transition with some of the usual inevitable imbalances. I have strong personal feelings about that based on a dear friend's situation when we were growing up. The emotional damage that causes kids is sad to witness because it's avoidable.

 

[MsMarple]

It is possible he forgot about retrieving her from the car at *some* point I suppose, but- the problem (for both the defense and the prosecution) would be proving at what point EXACTLY did this transition from his purposeful & habitual babysitter on wheels situation to his unintentional "I got distracted and forgot she was still out there!" situation.
Was it shortly after he arrived home, after he put the food/groceries away? Was it an hour later? 2 hours? 10 minutes before mom arrived home? And how does that specific point in time relate to her time of death? Was she already dead once this transitioned from intentional to forgetful? Sometime after?

And by what means do you prove WHEN he actually forgot other than by what he claims/will claim? Would he even honestly be able to be aware now, looking back, of when that important transition occurred?

No point to this post really just brainstorming out loud....

I agree and for that reason IMO this case might end up with a plea deal with charges reduced to something like involuntary manslaughter or whatever equivalent Arizona law, with the child abuse charge dropped.

Unless the DA wants to set a precedent warning caregivers that intentionally leaving children alone in a car for any reason which kills the child will be prosecuted as murder 2. Which is what I believe should happen but won’t hold my breath.

In that Nancy Grace video posted above I was surprised that the woman from Kids and Cars (I think her name is Amber) ignored the part about the dad leaving his daughter on purpose and instead focused only on his being distracted by putting the food away.

IMO that reflects the persistent notion that a parent has suffered enough, something I can understand in a true case of Forgotten Baby Syndrome but not in an intentional situation.
JMO

 

[NuttMegg]

I agree and for that reason IMO this case might end up with a plea deal with charges reduced to something like involuntary manslaughter or whatever equivalent Arizona law, with the child abuse charge dropped.

Unless the DA wants to set a precedent warning caregivers that intentionally leaving children alone in a car for any reason which kills the child will be prosecuted as murder 2. Which is what I believe should happen but won’t hold my breath.

In that Nancy Grace video posted above I was surprised that the woman from Kids and Cars (I think her name is Amber) ignored the part about the dad leaving his daughter on purpose and instead focused only on his being distracted by putting the food away.

IMO that reflects the persistent notion that a parent has suffered enough, something I can understand in a true case of Forgotten Baby Syndrome but not in an intentional situation.
JMO

I noticed that. She implied that he was just so busy putting groceries away. It sounded like a canned response to me, as though she was speaking for her organization.
I wish LE would check out that grocery purchase, find out if he left Parker in the car then, too. Maybe impossible, but maybe not, if they thought to confiscate the grocery tab.

 

[MsMarple]

I noticed that. She implied that he was just so busy putting groceries away. It sounded like a canned response to me, as though she was speaking for her organization.
I wish LE would check out that grocery purchase, find out if he left Parker in the car then, too. Maybe impossible, but maybe not, if they thought to confiscate the grocery tab.

Interesting question, did the dad ever leave the kids in the car in a public parking lot? Ugh.

What’s so maddening is how preventable this death was. The guest ME in the video said death can occur in as little as 30-60 minutes in temperatures that high. He also explained what happens as body temperature increases. It’s ugly.

How awful! Essentially the minute the car engine shut off a countdown to death began IMO. Frankly I don’t give a hoot if dad became “fatally distracted” by putting groceries away, his number one job was to keep his children safe and he PURPOSELY shirked his responsibility.

He will have to live with his “big mistake” for the rest of his life. Is that enough punishment? I say no. JMO

 

[al66pine]

What Did Dau Mean by "Food"

Per the Interim Affidavit, Dau(s?) stated: "he got distracted by playing his game and putting his food away." Did not say "groceries" in Affidavit.

What kind of food? Relevant?
--- Carry-out/take-away snacks/meals?
Maybe only one foam clamshell for himself? Or maybe a stack of them w 4 meals? Or one biggish bag of fast food?
Likely a few min?
--- Groceries?
------ If just a a box of cookies & gallon of milk? A few min?
------ If several/many bags of groceries, make 3-4-5 trips?
----------Carry into house, put on kit. COUNTER. A few min?
----------Carry bags into house, to SORT & put some groceries into some into fridge, some into freezer, some into pantry, some into the right kit cabs? Yep, could take 20-30 min?

Btwn the death & the arrest, seems MSM & some posts here converted "food" from dau's stmt in Interim Affidavit into "groceries."

May be a relevant & material difference, re ELAPSED TIME in which CRS forgot or misjudged. Well, CRS' DEFENSE would ARGUE.

Or may not be relevant or material. IDK.
___________________________

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/kvoa.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/1/78/17846bec-42fb-11ef-a3cf-0bbd73adf697/6695a5310511f.pdf.pdf

Thx agn to @LifeIsAMystery for posting ^ link.

 

[NuttMegg]

What Did Dau Mean by "Food"

Per the Interim Affidavit, Dau(s?) stated: "he got distracted by playing his game and putting his food away." Did not say "groceries" in Affidavit.

What kind of food? Relevant?
--- Carry-out/take-away snacks/meals?
Maybe only one foam clamshell for himself? Or maybe a stack of them w 4 meals? Or one biggish bag of fast food?
Likely a few min?
--- Groceries?
------ If just a a box of cookies & gallon of milk? A few min?
------ If several/many bags of groceries, make 3-4-5 trips?
----------Carry into house, put on kit. COUNTER. A few min?
----------Carry bags into house, to SORT & put some groceries into some into fridge, some into freezer, some into pantry, some into the right kit cabs? Yep, could take 20-30 min?

Btwn the death & the arrest, seems MSM & some posts here converted "food" from dau's stmt in Interim Affidavit into "groceries."

May be a relevant & material difference, re ELAPSED TIME in which CRS forgot or misjudged. Well, CRS' DEFENSE would ARGUE.

Or may not be relevant or material. IDK.
___________________________

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/kvoa.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/1/78/17846bec-42fb-11ef-a3cf-0bbd73adf697/6695a5310511f.pdf.pdf

Thx agn to @LifeIsAMystery for posting ^ link.

That's true. I don't know where I picked up "groceries". Thinking a bit more if there were "groceries", ie if he had to make 2 trips to the car or more, then he essentially made the decision several times to leave her in the car.

Probably the door cams showed the size of what he brought in.