JaneSA
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 1,249
- Reaction score
- 1
I agree with Bohemian that discussion of HP has gone on too long.
However, the reason it keeps coming back up is because some posters assume, without any genuine evidence, that she is the perpetrator of the fraud and thus in contact with and partnership with DH after Karlie's death.
The fact is, that is only supposition, admittedly picked up by MSM, but with no known basis in truth.
So whenever someone is disparaging about the nature and personality of HP and makes assumptions that she is guilty of something, it is logical, honest and sensible, IMO, to point out that she has willingly gone to the police, under her own steam, given hours of evidence but NOT been charged with any offence.
In my opinion, it is disingenuous to suggest that police have not charged her because they don't have enough evidence or they are waiting for something (what?).
To me it is obvious - they have not charge HP because she has not committed a crime.
To me it is also obvious that some people in the media display a prejudice against this woman that is based on nothing more than the cruel fact that she is in a wheelchair and didn't smile at journalists. I think that grossly unfair.
I know some people here are implacably convinced of HP's guilt, but I simply ask you to ask yourself, what exactly is that conviction based upon?
She may or may not be guilty. I will readily admit, I don't know.
But the fact is, nobody here knows; everybody just has their favourite prejudices.
However, the reason it keeps coming back up is because some posters assume, without any genuine evidence, that she is the perpetrator of the fraud and thus in contact with and partnership with DH after Karlie's death.
The fact is, that is only supposition, admittedly picked up by MSM, but with no known basis in truth.
So whenever someone is disparaging about the nature and personality of HP and makes assumptions that she is guilty of something, it is logical, honest and sensible, IMO, to point out that she has willingly gone to the police, under her own steam, given hours of evidence but NOT been charged with any offence.
In my opinion, it is disingenuous to suggest that police have not charged her because they don't have enough evidence or they are waiting for something (what?).
To me it is obvious - they have not charge HP because she has not committed a crime.
To me it is also obvious that some people in the media display a prejudice against this woman that is based on nothing more than the cruel fact that she is in a wheelchair and didn't smile at journalists. I think that grossly unfair.
I know some people here are implacably convinced of HP's guilt, but I simply ask you to ask yourself, what exactly is that conviction based upon?
She may or may not be guilty. I will readily admit, I don't know.
But the fact is, nobody here knows; everybody just has their favourite prejudices.