JaneSA
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 1,249
- Reaction score
- 1
Someone asked what the chances are of 2 suitcase being dumped so close together. I'd say very slight.
Both Kustom's suitcase and the one the police found were WELL back off the road. There is no way either bounced out of the back of a poorly loaded ute or truck.
Kustom's case was intentionally placed well back from the road, in the scrub, and may have been moved several times in the period from Sept 14 to March 15 when it reached its most recent location.
I think we have all assumed the when the police said that the remains were found "near" the suitcase and scattered contents, that meant within just a few steps. But maybe not.
Remembering back to the initial discovery, police were quite unsure whether the bones and clothes and case even belonged together, indicating quite a wide scattering. Possibly this may have been over 300 metres.
Just because they placed the evidence tent at a specific point, we have assumed that this is where the bones were located. Yet that has always bothered me because the police said the bones were behind and under a bush, and the tent is in a clearing.
So possibly, we have assumed things were found where they were not.
Perhaps the tent was nothing more that a spot for collecting the evidence, not a CSI TV Show type of "body covering tent"
However, if the original location was 300 mtrs from where the police pitched their tent, the bones may have been anywhere in-between those 2 points.
Also, wouldn't you think the police would have looked at the Google image by now anyway.
Haven't they seen this?
Both Kustom's suitcase and the one the police found were WELL back off the road. There is no way either bounced out of the back of a poorly loaded ute or truck.
Kustom's case was intentionally placed well back from the road, in the scrub, and may have been moved several times in the period from Sept 14 to March 15 when it reached its most recent location.
I think we have all assumed the when the police said that the remains were found "near" the suitcase and scattered contents, that meant within just a few steps. But maybe not.
Remembering back to the initial discovery, police were quite unsure whether the bones and clothes and case even belonged together, indicating quite a wide scattering. Possibly this may have been over 300 metres.
Just because they placed the evidence tent at a specific point, we have assumed that this is where the bones were located. Yet that has always bothered me because the police said the bones were behind and under a bush, and the tent is in a clearing.
So possibly, we have assumed things were found where they were not.
Perhaps the tent was nothing more that a spot for collecting the evidence, not a CSI TV Show type of "body covering tent"
However, if the original location was 300 mtrs from where the police pitched their tent, the bones may have been anywhere in-between those 2 points.
Also, wouldn't you think the police would have looked at the Google image by now anyway.
Haven't they seen this?
