coolcat
Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 354
- Reaction score
- 0
hmmmm .... Check out this c21westside twitter link for further info? http://twitter.com/#!/settlewestside..... Will let others join the dots
very interesting!!
hmmmm .... Check out this c21westside twitter link for further info? http://twitter.com/#!/settlewestside..... Will let others join the dots
After a week of trying to understand this tragedy I think:
The marriage was in trouble. The business was in trouble. They fought. Time of death 10:15pm. The suspect drove to the scout camp and disposed of the body in Kholo Creek expecting it wouldn't be found - but it rained moving the body to an exposed place. The morning after the death police saw evidence enough to declare the home a crime scene. The suspect didn't cooperate or confess knowing that without a body a murder charge can only be based on circumstantial evidence. He told the inlaws and children "She went for a walk and didn't come back." The police had evidence to believe she was dead and searched all the likely places a body might be hidden. The movement of the family cars became more important after the body was found to disprove an alibi. The killer may have confided to a former work colleague who initially witheld information. The family believe he will be charged with manslaughter or murder. The victims parents wisely and with the help of the media made an appeal for trust funds for the children while there is high public interest knowing there may be no other income stream available to raise them. When all scientific evidence is processed and all evidence re-checked an arrest will be made but as the suspect doesn't pose a flight risk or danger to others an arrest won't be made until after the funeral in the interests of the children. The solicitor and barrister will negotiate a guilty plea in return for a reduced sentence.
This is IMHO only, but I'm happy to disconnect and wait til next week to find out what happens.
Seems odd that they newbies mentioned here have only just joined the company C21 - wasn't GBC supposedly involved with a longstanding female C21 employee?
After a week of trying to understand this tragedy I think:
The marriage was in trouble. The business was in trouble. They fought. Time of death 10:15pm. The suspect drove to the scout camp and disposed of the body in Kholo Creek expecting it wouldn't be found - but it rained moving the body to an exposed place. The morning after the death police saw evidence enough to declare the home a crime scene. The suspect didn't cooperate or confess knowing that without a body a murder charge can only be based on circumstantial evidence. He told the inlaws and children "She went for a walk and didn't come back." The police had evidence to believe she was dead and searched all the likely places a body might be hidden. The movement of the family cars became more important after the body was found to disprove an alibi. The killer may have confided to a former work colleague who initially witheld information. The family believe he will be charged with manslaughter or murder. The victims parents wisely and with the help of the media made an appeal for trust funds for the children while there is high public interest knowing there may be no other income stream available to raise them. When all scientific evidence is processed and all evidence re-checked an arrest will be made but as the suspect doesn't pose a flight risk or danger to others an arrest won't be made until after the funeral in the interests of the children. The solicitor and barrister will negotiate a guilty plea in return for a reduced sentence.
This is IMHO only, but I'm happy to disconnect and wait til next week to find out what happens.
Not sure if I am allowed to post this if not I apologise and understand if it gets deleted. However a link for another forum Aussie Criminals and Crooks was posted to the thread earlier. The very end of this thread is around the identity of the ex colleage who has been questioned several times and the last post gives information to identify who they believe this is. Could just be rumour. I personally found it really interesting this woman is South African. This is just info I stumbled accross as I said no idea if it's factual.
C21 Westside' corporate Twitter account @settlewestside seems to be the reference point for the above ........
I work in the Law industry and a lawyer is the person that basically does the ground work, they take instructions and basically take the affidavits and go through the case with client and collect the info....whereas a Barrister disects the info and presents the case if in court...It has always annoyed me that a Barrister gets paid more then the lawyer because it is the lawyer that does most of the hard yards...I wondered why he had retained the Barrister because this is not a procedure that is done so early on...You generally only need the Barrister once Court proceedings are about to commence.
A Barrister usuallly specialises in a particular field and is more knowledgeable with regard to various precedents etc..
The Lawyer was not so surprising but the Barrister set alarm bells ringing when I read about GBC retaining his services.
I guess having a barrister so early on if GBC thought he was going to be pinned with this is a smart move, so that they could get a headstart although it doesn't look good to the public??
Something is certainly waiting in the wings for GBC that is for sure!
I can't even find her twitter account!
C21 Westside' corporate Twitter account @settlewestside seems to be the reference point for the above ........ The tip from elsewhere were the initials LL ... Over to you sleuths
Your naughty HN MAN....LMAO!
I did notice this though and sluethed the hell out of it......Came across some nice pics although I don't know if this is a POI seems a strange choice if you know what I mean??
I like the rebel in you though..lol!
Also if you look a deeper into this and look at the twitter account of the lady mentioned in this in the tweet here you will notice that there are a number of news reporters following her account. Just find this interesting not sure what others think.
Also if you look a deeper into this and look at the twitter account of the lady mentioned in this in the tweet here you will notice that there are a number of news reporters following her account. Just find this interesting not sure what others think.
I think she is following them. I can only see that one person is following her..unless I have got it all wrong, which is possible.
Another thing the police weren't searching that area so it wasnt SES and a "passing canoiest" in a muddy creek. Its not the sought of creek and area you would pass?
OMG that article has been removed from the Courier site due to LEGAL REASONS.
Here is just a confirmation of there words stated as to why they left:
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...usiness-suffered/story-e6freoof-1226344121450
Also if you look a deeper into this and look at the twitter account of the lady mentioned in this in the tweet here you will notice that there are a number of news reporters following her account. Just find this interesting not sure what others think.
Totally agree. If anyone premeditated this debauched mess, they are the most stupid person / people on the planet. Like many others I believe this was an accidental escalation of an attack, with unexpected consequences. Hence the weirdness witnessed since.