Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
can forensic people determine whether a person had sex before or after they were deceased??
anjay - "xxxxx is also said to have been charged with a sex offence."
I think it is more likely that the blood outside was the blood of the family on the shoes of the killer.
Hi, new to this
Have been reading all of your posts up until Friday and then missed for two days.
I am from Victoria and have read as much as I can about this case. I just really hope that they have the right person and the actual details all come out
it only says a source told them, it may still prove to be incorrect and agree with mum73 it does not say outright rape it says a sex offence, this could be numerous different things.
but as was stated in earlier posts it would explain why the public gallery gasped during the hearing...well that and the fact that they could have been very discriptive as to the nature of the multiple stab wounds.
I just realised that my post above sounds a bit convoluted.
My purpose was to point out that the DNA evidence, whatever it is, may not actally prove who the murderer was.
I wanted to consider why the alleged killer's DNA may have been found at the scene but may not necessarily indicate that he was the killer.
This doesn't say rape, it says a sex offence...it could be carnal knowledge.
Don't forget the lady earlier whom said he had cuts on his arm, if this lady is telling the truth then he must be involved.
I agree with James23 on this.
Police do not take that sort of thing seriously.
It is so common and a waste of their time.
Why would they "gasp" if they knew he was an exboyfriend that she was still seeing? Is the gasping thing an exaggerated rumor