Sorry Ausgirl. No offense intended to the people that manage their money well. But, to me, the 'food stamp' system that they have in the US would help stamp out some of the abuse by the people that do abuse the system, while still assisting those that need the system. They still give a smaller allowance of $$ for things like utility bills and car expenses, but it reduces the amount of money that does not get used for essentials and instead gets used for grog and drugs by those that do that.
Maybe it should be put in place for the people that are prone to abusing the system .. but not everybody.
To me, there needs to be some middle ground here. None of us likes that people like Chloe's mother misused pretty much all of her funds, to the detriment of her child.
Obviously it is not the total answer ... but it may help some kids to get fed better.
No need for sorry, it wasn't you I was ranting at, rather the general sort of unthinking blah that happens.
I would just die of cringe, if I was forced to hand over food stamps at the supermarket. It's incredibly hard on the self-esteem to be unable to work, on a fixed income to begin with. To hell with food stamps, I reckon. I *payed* my taxes, all those years - I would hate to be treated like a basket case who can't be trusted with cash! But then, I abuse neither children nor drugs. And so what if I want a pack of smokes - tough titties, that's my business and nobody else's.
So yes, I agree, a voucher system would not work for everyone's best interests. Such a system for say, convicted drug users *might* be affective, but looking at how that works in America, people sell their food stamps for drug money and neglect their kids anyway... and where drugs are concerned, a lack of cash to buy them with = more burglaries/muggings/robberies, more prostitution, etc.
Perhaps compulsory drug testing + clean results or you lose your kids might help protect littlies better.. plus, a FACS overhaul. Plus, them not hiring idiots. That'd be some real progress for the kiddies. I reckon.