Yah, thats what I thought too.
Ditto
Yah, thats what I thought too.
Look! Do you see the real CSK?
[video]https://youtu.be/eTpMkQV_bfk[/video]
Hi Spooks,
I did look at this video. Only on my iPhone screen. Thought I would go frame by frame. Decided to focus on the crowd standing talking behind JR. I couldn't help but watch the very tall, dark haired guy with big sign on the back of his jacket. He is very friendly with some guy coming out of the hotel door, opens his arms, hugs other guy. Goes back to talking then walks into hotel and I don't see him come back out. All the time JR is standing at the pole. This man looks very like a younger version of the accused CSK. Just a different way of looking at video. I'm sure this man would have been DNA tested by police as they say everyone in the video was accounted for except mm. MOO
If the man you're thinking about is wearing a black jacket with a white symbol on the back of the jacket, then that person was a security bouncer.
The white symbol was a big letter "C" of The Continental Hotel logo.
............................................
Posts are purely my own opinion unless otherwise stated with source links. All my original text and images remain exclusively my personal copyright.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]
We call it first hand information. As the source of that Taxi despatch knowledge is yourself. If MSM were to seek to report it, where would they go? To a first hand source. IE: yourself. Which is what is colloquially known as an insider. On WS, an insider can get verified, if they are hassled by others asking them to prove their bona-fides, so that they can do so in private and the admins can say "here, you lot can accept this person as verified to give a first hand account".Surely I shouldn't have to become verified just because I can explain how the taxi industry worked 20 odd years ago. That's a bit ridiculous. I'm not quoting research etc as knowledge and i doubt that there is any Internet information about how the industry ran in Perth 20 years ago so very hard to impossible to link. Let's just call it what it is: local knowledge.
Hi Spooks,
I did look at this video. Only on my iPhone screen. Thought I would go frame by frame. Decided to focus on the crowd standing talking behind JR. I couldn't help but watch the very tall, dark haired guy with big sign on the back of his jacket. He is very friendly with some guy coming out of the hotel door, opens his arms, hugs other guy. Goes back to talking then walks into hotel and I don't see him come back out. All the time JR is standing at the pole. This man looks very like a younger version of the accused CSK. Just a different way of looking at video. I'm sure this man would have been DNA tested by police as they say everyone in the video was accounted for except mm. MOO
Look! Do you see the real CSK?
[video]https://youtu.be/eTpMkQV_bfk[/video]
Now that's weird. I swear that the girl that comes out in this you tube vision, is the same as one of Jane's supposed friends that exits with her at 23.41 pm.She is number 2, comes out just ahead of Jane and just talks to the bouncer. Another girl joins her. Jane goes over to pole and talks with another girls (1) that has come out of Conti ahead of her.
"Friends 2 and 3"just talk to bouncer and don't interact with Jane when they first exit Conti. 2 and 3 are both gone from vision when Jane is still at pole talking at 23.41.38 -58.
What happens to friends 1, 2 and 3 as they were supposed to get a taxi home, although never any images of Jane and friends walking to CBV or friends going past in taxi as CIA documentary said they did.
(First image is from Haley Jane version of CIA documentary) Other image from https://youtu.be/eTpMkQV_bfk
23.41 JR exits Image 2 (23.58.38) white jacket guy help long haired girl put jacket on and hugs.
O
Hi Spooks,
If you look at the you tube video you posted at 0:10 you see a man walk across left to right at bottom of screen. Looks like he came out of hotel but may have just walked into frame from the street. He seems to be heading towards roadway. This is the man that walks up to JR later in video. Sorry -I am unable to post the pic from my phone. MOO
CORRECTION - Sorry!!
No. 3 talks to 2 (not 1) with the bouncer when they leave the club originally.
I've never thought 2 was JR friend. Shes is obviously still there and not interacting with JR at all in last portion of the video posted by Spooks.
Did we assume 3 was the 4th friend because she appears to be leaving the club with Jane initially (in the first portion of the video - not posted above)? It is strange that we dont see her join them & shes gone from view. Perhaps neither are friends.
Maybe 1 ? JR are waiting at the pole for No. 4 still to come out & shes never seen on the video? Or is that part of the documentary also wrong & the re-enactment should be 3 girls not 4?
1, ?, JR are friends for sure. 1,? Have left in cab already in above footage. JR still there. 2 has nothing to do with them & is still there. 3 or another unknown is 4th friend also gone with 1, ?. Thats how I see it. No.idea why theres no footage of them at all returning. Could they possibly have jagged walking back totally unseen in the exact 50secs the footage goes to cameras 3/4 inside? Seems a little .. shall we say strange!!
The whole video is a joke really. Spliced footage, added blur, 2secs here, 10secs there & entire rotations of both outside cameras missing, all the while shes standing there!! So, what else did we miss?? & why cant we see it?? The quality is terrible, we know they lied about that.
Yet we believe they've identified and DNA tested every person on the footage because they said they did? Sorry I'll pass.. Im not buying that