Bartholemeus
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,498
- Reaction score
- 21
The first option is much more likely for a number of reasons;Also as for the Karrakatta victim surviving I personally don't think this was due to her not seeing or hearing the rapist due to concealing himself but rather either of 2 theories, one being he had simply not progressed from sexual assault to murder at that stage or secondly he was pretty sure she would die and not finishing her off was as an error (I believe this because I recall reading she was "left for dead")
1. The words "left for dead" don't necessarily take on a literal meaning. I had a mate once who vomited in my car. I pulled over, dragged him out and left him for dead. No other adjectives related to not sexual injuries were used in media reports such as brutal, horrific, near-fatal etc
2. Even though we haven't really been told anything about her injuries, if they were critical (as in he intended to kill her) then this would have made the case higher profile and it would have been reported in the media.
3. There's a strong chance the CSK victims had their throats slashed. I'm reasonably sure the victim didn't have her throat slashed.
I think he realised if he kept on raping and letting the victims live he would get caught (DNA). Another option is he wanted to show his face and if he did this he'd need to step up to murder.