Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #6

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bartholemeus said:
You claimed he moved out of Macro and into forensics and this suggests he moved there because they must have DNA. I'm not saying it's not true, just that it's a massive leap of logic. Why don't we move on and leave it at "we don't know until you find more info".
Click to expand...

No..that is only PART of the reason I believe they have DNA.
If you recall..I said I would need to compile a timeline so things were more obvious. I could just link every article, but that would be a massive read!
 
MyLeftFoot said:
No..that is only PART of the reason I believe they have DNA.
If you recall..I said I would need to compile a timeline so things were more obvious. I could just link every article, but that would be a massive read!
Click to expand...
Happy to wait for you compile a timeline.

At the moment I'm still slightly in favour of no DNA but I'm keen to see any evidence or well thought out theories as to why there is DNA. There are some things that suggest they do have DNA, so maybe a well compiled list or argument might shed some light.

If they have DNA then the case is solvable. It provides us light at the end of the tunnel. Without it I don't think it will be solved.
 
MyLeftFoot said:
Top cop taken off cold case (and straight into the forensic division)

Grant Taylor - The West Australian on October 3, 2015, 12:35 am


https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/29709275/top-cop-taken-off-cold-case/#page1
Click to expand...

Is there any reason you're being sneaky? Previously you copy and pasted out of LinkedIn but removed the bit that says he's been in forensics for 10 years (which sort of shows your assumption that he swapped from Macro to Forensics to be a misinterpretation). Now you've added in the words "and straight into the forensic division" as if it's written in the article.

There is nothing in LinkedIn or the article (your two sources) that suggest he has swapped from Macro to Forensics. End of story. Why are you continuing with it? I don't see a need to be disingenuous.
 
Bartholemeus said:
Is there any reason you're being sneaky? Previously you copy and pasted out of LinkedIn but removed the bit that says he's been in forensics for 10 years (which sort of shows your assumption that he swapped from Macro to Forensics to be a misinterpretation). Now you've added in the words "and straight into the forensic division" as if it's written in the article.

There is nothing in LinkedIn or the article (your two sources) that suggest he has swapped from Macro to Forensics. End of story. Why are you continuing with it? I don't see a need to be disingenuous.
Click to expand...

Oh for Petes sake!!! Go and have a bex!

For everyone's benefit...
https://au.linkedin.com/userp/title/detective/perth
https://au.linkedin.com/in/jim-stanbury-67375a38

There is NO deception going on here!!!!!
 
Bartholemeus said:
Is there any reason you're being sneaky? Previously you copy and pasted out of LinkedIn but removed the bit that says he's been in forensics for 10 years (which sort of shows your assumption that he swapped from Macro to Forensics to be a misinterpretation). Now you've added in the words "and straight into the forensic division" as if it's written in the article.

There is nothing in LinkedIn or the article (your two sources) that suggest he has swapped from Macro to Forensics. End of story. Why are you continuing with it? I don't see a need to be disingenuous.
Click to expand...

The article says he got shown the door. He went from one job to another job. Seems clear to me.
 
Mo Joe said:
Lisa Jane Brown 1998. Dressed like Nicole Reid. Why isn't Lisa Jane Brown mentioned more in CSK discussions? Why isn't Lisa Jane Brown getting the attention of the other girls. Perhaps he moved areas when Claremont got too hot?
Click to expand...
It has been mentioned in the past some time over the years but there seemed to be a few reasons why it wasn't linked to csk . I will have a look mo joe

layout app for photos
 
Mo Joe said:
The article says he got shown the door. He went from one job to another job. Seems clear to me.
Click to expand...
But neither source suggest he went from Macro to "forensics" as suggested. He changed roles. We don't know his specific role or team. It was suggested he moved to "forensics" and this was because they probably have DNA. This is a pretty big leap in logic.
 
Bartholemeus said:
But neither source suggest he went from Macro to "forensics" as suggested. He changed roles. We don't know his specific role or team. It was suggested he moved to "forensics" and this was because they probably have DNA. This is a pretty big leap in logic.
Click to expand...

Yes yes..you are right. It never happened. And Trump lost the US election. Whateva!
 
MyLeftFoot said:
Yes yes..you are right. It never happened. And Trump lost the US election. Whateva!
Click to expand...
I think you need a more mature approach. If you post something and it doesn't pass the sniff test, people will ask questions. The LinkedIn profile didn't suggest what you thought it did and it should have ended there. No biggie. But you felt compelled to go on with it and edit/change and misrepresent the information you presented. I never suggested it "didn't happen" either. I just said that the sources you provided don't provide enough evidence of what you suggested. I think you need to settle down about the whole thing.
 
Bartholemeus said:
I think you need a more mature approach. If you post something and it doesn't pass the sniff test, people will ask questions. The LinkedIn profile didn't suggest what you thought it did and it should have ended there. No biggie. But you felt compelled to go on with it and edit/change and misrepresent the information you presented. I never suggested it "didn't happen" either. I just said that the sources you provided don't provide enough evidence of what you suggested. I think you need to settle down about the whole thing.
Click to expand...

And I said.....I WILL COMPILE A TIMELINE so hopefully it will all make sense. I also said...the sources I provided were just for the interim until I get clearance on the alternative source.
I also said that the Stanbury transfer was only a PART of my conclusion regarding DNA.
Any information I post is for the benefit of ALL... anyone is free to believe what they want.
I refuse to argue this point with you any further Bartholemeous.
This issue is now closed
Good night!
 
Mo Joe said:
I'd like to see an identikit made with an average head, hair, ears, nose, mouth, eyes and chin.
Click to expand...
Mo joe do you mean an actual csk idkit ? Can you elaborate how or why it could be created ?

layout app for photos
 
(Rsbm ) quote bart ; The TV show had us believe that this bunch of frauds/psychics read the case files and then lead them to the murder/dump sites without peviously knowing where they were. Absolute BS. They would have had that info in the case files and I suspect police worked with them closely to get out the information they wanted to get out.

So most likely the same thing has happened with the CSK identikit. Either they saw that identikit lifted from Sunday Night, or they had a source to describe a suspect. They would have had some sort of intelligence and filled in the gaps.

So while these guys are frauds, it's possible that the identikit holds some sort of relevance.[/QUOTE]


Thats interesting bart , you believe its possible the psychic id kit picture had some merit. Can anyone say how / why ?
Otherwise its total crap misinformation that serves no purpose of benefit and can be disregarded. But is there something genuine about it ?



layout app for photos
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 177 more.
Total: 435 (members: 178, guests: 257)

Online statistics

Members online
178
Guests online
257
Total visitors
435
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,688
Messages
18,244,102
Members
234,423
Latest member
hikergirl112
Back
Top