Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like someone took belmont little athletics offline
I was thinking same. He'd be a moron to do it from his own business premises...a brother or fathers business premises however...
Probably wasnt even supposed to be there if it happened that way
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
A moronic action yes but keep in mind Dennis Radar the BTK "played" with one of his deceased victims inside the church he was president of, posing her for photos and getting his jollies so this kind of circumstance is def not unheard of.
Can you find a copy of the article? The only one that I've read (and the one the original poster quoted from The West Australian) did not say the kimono was stolen from the Clarke murder. It simply said the kimono was stolen and police were investigating that the kimono might provide a connection between Clarke and the Huntingdale assault. It may have been stolen from the Huntingdale victim, or someone else. The article did not elaborate.You are reading the wrong article then.
There was a recent article that had a photo which someone enlarged, in the photo was another news article from 1988 claiming the kimono was stolen from the clarke murder and left at the huntingdale attack.
There is no confirmation as to if this is true or reporter error but it was in fact reported.
A WOMAN'S silk dressing gown stolen off a washing line 28 years ago is believed to have been the vital clue that helped lead police to finally make an arrest in the Claremont serial killer case.
It can be revealed that in 1988 — eight years before Sarah Spiers was abducted off a Claremont street — the white kimono was dropped by an intruder who broke into the home of an 18-year-old Huntingdale woman and tried to rape her.
Looks like someone took belmont little athletics offline
Thanks, but no. Someone is claiming that an article says the kimono was stolen from the Victoria Heather Clarke murder and it was then dropped at the 1988 Huntingdale location. I don't believe that any article claims that.Is this the kimono article you are after?
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...e/news-story/d5498c5d0593771d7f526f90646d52f0
Can you find a copy of the article? The only one that I've read (and the one the original poster quoted from The West Australian) did not say the kimono was stolen from the Clarke murder. It simply said the kimono was stolen and police were investigating that the kimono might provide a connection between Clarke and the Huntingdale assault. It may have been stolen from the Huntingdale victim, or someone else. The article did not elaborate.
Maybe you can settle the debate Mordekai, was he sub-average intelligence as some on here are convinced? OR Slighty above average intelligence as most known caught serial killers are, or was he very intelligent?
This was all posted by someone else on here but I do remember reading the enlarged article from 1988 which made up the photo of a current article. I am about to go have dinner so if you can't wait then search the posts from mid way through this thread, if you have patience I will try and track it down when I return in a few hours.
So back to the kimono - I went and got the paper out of the bin and used a magnifying glass to read the newspaper cutting in this picture
The text says :
"The West Australian, Perth Wednesday Feruary 17 1988
Kimono clue to a brutal killing
by Cyril Ayris
This kimono may be the clue that helps
solve the brutal killing of Victoria Heather
Clark, 30, in Victoria Park last September.
It was dropped by a man that walked
into a Huntingdale house early on Monday
morning and lay on top of a sleeping
18-year-old girl...
The kimono is the first good clue the police
have been given in recent sex attacks in the area.
Det-Sgt Max Kiernan said the man
apparently walked into the house..."
I still don't see what the link is??
Do they have some kind of privacy policy or terms and conditions? I think it would be unethical if you gave information that wasn't attached to BE. Otherwise why do they have that information available to the general public? If not to be viewed..I'm looking to pay for a search on the family trust related to the computer store previously mentioned to see who the beneficiaries are. It is a very comprehensive registration process and got me thinking about if it's legal to do that kind of search as an individual for this reason. It's not like they're trying to borrow money from me. Any thoughts...?
Wow - the exemptions in WA for WWC are a little alarming. /QUOTE]
BRE and his wife/partner would have needed to go thru annual(?) WA WWC checks as soon as their child(ren) stopped participating in Little Athletics.
I'm looking to pay for a search on the family trust related to the computer store previously mentioned to see who the beneficiaries are. It is a very comprehensive registration process and got me thinking about if it's legal to do that kind of search as an individual for this reason. It's not like they're trying to borrow money from me. Any thoughts...?
I wouldn't feel too sorry for many of these people from what I have been told. I won't post on here but yeah, there are strong reasons why they police followed them.
This?