YoureNicked
Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2012
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 21
I don't think this is BE. The description doesn't seem to match as at the time of this occurring (1989), he would have been 19-21.
Yes, good point. I had forgotten the victim said her attacker seemed older 'at least thirty' due to his hard whiskers, which would make him too old to have been BE.