Edited by me for brevity
I agree I got that impression too.
And what's more she seemed to enjoy making her letters to the editor just cryptic enough that not all will understand. There are a couple of examples such as those I posted half an hour ago entitled bragging rights and cut the glitz. Another is the one she sent to the Herald Sun on Saturday
"You should know what you are voting for before you cast your vote, she purportedly wrote.
Thank you John Howard for being forthright and honest in what has been a vicious campaign largely run by extremist.
I love and respect gay people and they deserve better than this, she said."
http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...doorknocking-neighbours-in-elisa-curry-search
Because of the final sentence it could be assumed she was a supporter of same sex marriage. However I did a quick Google and it's clear that what she was thanking John Howard for on Saturday was this:
"Howard has come out strongly for a "no" vote to the extent that he authorised a full-page advertisement, with a very prime ministerial look about it, in last Saturday's*Canberra Times."
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/sames...the-permanent-politician-20171004-gyu5ka.html
So quite the opposite. I find it intriguing the cryptic way she structures her letters.
Just my thoughts, but i think she was being a little sarcastic? From the letters i've read... i think she supports marriage equality - "they deserve better than this" as I remember. correct me if i am wrong anyone...