cvaldez1975
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
- Messages
- 15,689
- Reaction score
- 43,891
so this mom and baby were murdered basically for welfare fraud? I don't get it, it isn't that much money. some ppl are savages.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So how is it DH ends up in NSW? The prison or prison state he resided prior?
who was charged with two counts of murder in December last year, is accused of murdering Karlie Pearce-Stevenson in late 2008, five days before he killed her daughter Khandalyce.
There is significant material still outstanding from South Australia, Northern Territory, Queensland and the ACT,” crown prosecutor Victoria Engels told Magistrate Les Mabbutt.
*BBM
Sam Buckingham-Jones
The Australian
11:46AM September 8, 2016
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...l/news-story/c3e5e5e19d10f0d3740fddbbd511d172
so this mom and baby were murdered basically for welfare fraud? I don't get it, it isn't that much money. some ppl are savages.
so this mom and baby were murdered basically for welfare fraud? I don't get it, it isn't that much money. some ppl are savages.
Yes it is all a bit confusing.
Then, on October 8, the first call came through that not only provided a breakthrough but linked the two investigations in the most tragic way.
The caller outlined that single mother Karlie Jade Pearce-Stevenson and her daughter Khandalyce had been missing for six years.
"The initial caller identified that Karlie and Khandalyce had been missing since about 2009, although at the time of the call there wasn't a missing person report in existence," South Australia Police Detective Superintendent Des Bray said.
That call was the 1267th received by South Australian detectives in relation to the Wynarka investigation.
Four calls later, someone provided a photograph showing Khandalyce in a stroller with the quilt that was found in the suitcase with her bones. Then a later photograph showed Khandalyce wearing a pink dress found in the suitcase.
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/the-call-...ng-murder-investigations-20151021-gkf1q7.html
November is going to be a busy months by the sounds of it
Shame Karlie is deceased. Id like to know where this came from. Whether it was given to her etc. Its a custom quilt.
The NSW Court Lists Online Registry shows DH is up for Police Mention in the Central Local Court on 15 November 2016. See https://onlineregistry.lawlink.nsw....ate%22%2C%22sortOrder%22%3A%22ASC%22%7D%7D%7D
Do you think he'll appear and interested members of the public will be able to attend? Is it worth attending at this early stage if only to have a look-see?
I remember that identity documents were found in DH's relatives house, his sister specifically, if I'm remembering correctly."A woman in a wheelchair, accompanied by a man, impersonated Pearce-Stevenson to staff at a credit union in June 2010 using her identity documents. Another woman impersonated her at a Centrelink office in South Australia the same year, using identity documents for Pearce-Stevenson and her daughter Khandalyce.[SUP]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death...son_and_Khandalyce_Pearce#cite_note-90K-ID-13
This is from Wikipedia, so might be dubious, but am interested if there is still another woman involved in this investigation.
[/SUP]
Wasn't it made for Khandalyce by either Karlies mother or grandmother?November is going to be a busy months by the sounds of it
Shame Karlie is deceased. Id like to know where this came from. Whether it was given to her etc. Its a custom quilt.
As both hearings are only a mention, it could well be over in minutes. Nothing to see here basically. The committal hearing (when it is eventually designated) will be of more interest but I'm not sure if it will be an open court. IMO we won't see any 'movement' with this case until early next year.
So if he pleads guilty it could be 2 weeks, not guilty could be June next year. eeeewwwweee too long
RSBM].
So if he pleads guilty it could be 2 weeks, not guilty could be June next year. eeeewwwweee too long
Thanks for the heads up on the quilt.
If he chooses to remain silent as he has in the past & if in his silence he pleads neither guilty or not guilty then I assume the court would automatically interpret his silence as not guilty.
From what I understand after reading the following, the answer to your question would be yes, SA.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1986 - SECT 155
Refusal to plead
155 Refusal to plead
'If an accused person who is arraigned stands mute, or will not answer directly to the indictment, the court may order a plea of “not guilty” to be entered on behalf of the accused person, and the plea so entered has the same effect as if the accused person had actually pleaded “not guilty”.'
s155 Refusal to plead
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1986
- As at 12 October 2016
- Act 209 of 1986
Sorry symbah I meant this for you, not SouthAussie. D'oh *facepalm*