SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,778
- Reaction score
- 181,404
I agree with your views about the note KG1.
I don't believe Lucy McCallum would be in the least concerned about SG or his friends harming her if she did not find in his favour. The fact she is a woman does not make her more fearful than a male judge in criminal courts or family courts. Very few criminals or enraged family members are able to get close enough to judges to threaten them in this country. I can only think of one Family Court judge (Opit J) and the wife of a Family Court judge (Pearl Watson) who were murdered, apparently by people unhappy with these judge' decisions.
Agreed Theodora ... Lucy McCallum didn't get to where she is by being afraid of people like SG. When I read through her previous cases (at least the ones in MSM) she has angered a few people in her time ... including pretty much the whole MSM industry in a libel case where MSM were ordered to reveal a source ... and she keeps on with her work.
I noticed that when I was looking for a photo of her, the photos are very far and few between. In fact, I could only find one photo (that named her), and interestingly it was in an article by one of those angry MSM companies about the libel case!
I'm sure she has a silent phone number, a secure home, takes sensible precautions in her life, and is protected by a mandatory life sentence (where life means life) if anything untoward should happen.