Agreed...
As I've read through the reports, there seems that there is a great deal of assumption from Police regarding what happened. It is all 'alleged'. Its sounds like the Police are piecing it together - but due to JK not talking - the Police have to assume from evidence what happened.
Yet there are conflicting stories here through msm again:
Mr Breton said his client was helping police as much as possible and was unsure if he would fight the charges. SMH
-----
"He's doing his best to assist police with their enquiries and he will continue to do so assuming that they want any further assistance." SMH
-----
The Daily Telegraph understands details outlining the events leading to Huxley's death are included in a fact sheet, but Kelsall has made no admissions and is refusing to talk to police. Telegraph
I think JK is being advised by his lawyer not to talk.
This also makes me think something about the case is not airtight.
Another thought is that it wasn't random - he had a motive - he's not talking about that or anything else. He's covering.
For his Lawyer to sound so confident about bail, and the Police leaning on a fact sheet for their submission without a confession, I wonder how likely it is that he will achieve bail?
.