To me, for a 31 yo man drunk or sober to invite another man to his home after midnight following a just a quick chat on the street implausible.
One may invite someone to their place after a whole day of drinking and partying together, but not after only bumping them on the street 1:30 am...
Facts are the accused is not charged with sexual assault, both the accused, and the police are talking about a sexual activity taken place, there is no forced entry, everything was confined to the deceased' bedroom, and the deceased was not fully dressed when he was found. It is also obvious that the deceased was not in a monogamous relationship.
It is not difficult to imagine a conflict arising between a drunken man and a concrete thinking man during and or after a deal of some encounter of sexual nature.
It is not clear if they new each other, if they spent anytime together, how the accused left the crime scene potentially covered in blood, how the accused was tagged by the police but not a prime suspect although the accused was the last person seen together with the deceased on CCTV before the deceased was found.
As with the schools owners changing story, quite a few bits and pieces will change in the coming days, I believe.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
now Free