SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,980
- Reaction score
- 183,355
...so... we know that the accused drove a Blue Nissan Patrol that was in the area at the right time...
I'd be confident the LE had enough to charge the accused for murder prior to the arrest... that is, without even knowing if they could find any human remains...
We really have no clue as to what the LE know! I think this has been a supremely executed investigation by the Victorian Police so far...I am really intrigued as to what happened... as we all are!
So what "could" the LE know?
1. DNA (matching the accused at the campsite of RH & CC)
2. Fingerprints (matching the accused at the campsite of RH & CC)
3. An admission (by the accused whilst he is under surveillance)
4. Evidence from nearby campers (I think this is strong and the LE just haven't released this type of information).
5. Evidence from family of accused....
6. Triangulation of radar, CCTV and mobile phone data etc... putting him in the area at the right time
7. Strangely leaving the area in the middle of the night
...still, none of the scenarios above shows that there was an intent to kill anyone (except number 4... the admission part)
....accusing and charging a person with murder is about the highest bar in legal terms and requires very strong evidence that shows the the accused had intended to do so..... so...What is it?...I am so intrigued!
I cannot even begin to imagine what senseless situation led GL to murder Carol and Russell.
I think maybe Russell was murdered in rage, and Carol was murdered because Russell was. (Only because it has been stated once or twice that Russell was one to hold his ground if confronted, or words to that effect.)
Really a sick and sad situation.
I wonder if we will ever find out what happened. There is probably only one person who knows (for sure) now, and that's him.