I would also think if ST was an informant and RB & AD were suspicious about that and thought they pretty much knew that, then that would be a motive for murdering Sam, as that is what can happen to informants that infiltrate the drug scene. All IMO
I found it! I could have sworn there was actual video and not just a photo of him but I have looked and looked and cant seem to find it.
Thank you for clearing that up, he looks tall in that photo but knowing the other guy is short I can let that go. Im more inclined now to think RB is the one involved in the robbery. The noses look similar and it would make sense why he is so hesitant and/or chummy at the end since he knows Sam.Yes - that's the pic that nickers posted on here earlier that I was referring to.
The guy next to him is VERY short compared to everyone else on his FB pics. Therefore RB is not super tall - he's either short or average - as he's only a little taller.
How does anyone know who the guy in that photo with RB is?Yes - that's the pic that nickers posted on here earlier that I was referring to.
The guy next to him is VERY short compared to everyone else on his FB pics. Therefore RB is not super tall - he's either short or average - as he's only a little taller.
How does anyone know who the guy in that photo with RB is?
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
Would like to know this too.How does anyone know who the guy in that photo with RB is?
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
If RB is the kingpin in a drug distribution network, imo, he'd have several people in his pocket. It'll be interesting if it's revealed when AD became involved and was trusted enough to be in on a meeting with Sam.
I find that image of the second robber confusing because all in all the other facial shots he appears to be wearing a mask over the lower part of his face. I don't know whether it's a resolution issue or the video has deliberately blurred out his face. I'm inclined to think he's wearing a mask in this side shot as well but it's clinging to his face. I'm not willing to conclude that he's baby-faced.
I wonder how the heights mentioned were judged. If they came from the victims' descriptions they might deliberately misleading.
I was very confused too, having watched it a number of times. When you stop the footage at that moment and zoom in (screen cap it) the face is visible; however elsewhere in the footage the mask covers the face. I still feel that this footage has been edited in parts.
IMO I don't think either AD or RB are actually involved in this robbery, I'm leaning towards associates. Also if this (robbery) was somehow staged (which I doubt), the last 2 people you'd suspect as being willing participants would be the 2 accused.
Yes I believe it is also, I was working nearby late last year and early this year, so would often stop by the bonneyview after work. I would sometimes go for lunch and recall that the ute seemed to be home most of the time. I parked outside RB'S house once because the spot was free. ...passed a real "unsavoury" bloke on my return only to nod and just got a glare back.That certainly looks like the ute that was in that overhead pic from Google Earth before. Good find, Seabreeze!
Yes I believe it is also, I was working nearby late last year and early this year, so would often stop by the bonneyview after work. I would sometimes go for lunch and recall that the ute seemed to be home most of the time. I parked outside RB'S house once because the spot was free. ...passed a real "unsavoury" bloke on my return only to nod and just got a glare back.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk
I was very confused too, having watched it a number of times. When you stop the footage at that moment and zoom in (screen cap it) the face is visible; however elsewhere in the footage the mask covers the face. I still feel that this footage has been edited in parts.
IMO I don't think either AD or RB are actually involved in this robbery, I'm leaning towards associates. Also if this (robbery) was somehow staged (which I doubt), the last 2 people you'd suspect as being willing participants would be the 2 accused.
From what I have read and according to LE, RB knew St and AD but ST did not know AD. According to local(s) ST and AD did know each other. Based on this I think at most ST and AD knew "of" each other but it didnt go much beyond that.Yeah, don't know what all the connection between the three is yet? It did state in an msm article that ST & RB knew each other though. As to AD i don't know what the thing was with him? People have said they all knew each other, but for how long? And did Sam know them when he was working in childcare?
I found it! I could have sworn there was actual video and not just a photo of him but I have looked and looked and cant seem to find it.