emirates1957
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Messages
- 1,602
- Reaction score
- 2,508
Are you of the opinion that ALL cases have been built and put before a jury to the best of all ability?
Are you of the opinion that there is no corruption or pay-offs or bias within the law?
Do you genuinely think there's a "historical" reason why the object that GT was trying to obscure, then carrying and then discarded of within moments of leaving his apartment where a woman just moments before had fallen to her death, was not submitted as evidence by the prosecution?
Do you think that the things that weren't submitted in court, but yet we are privvy to (being that we are not in the jury), makes us more or less able to form a non-legal opinion in our minds?
The law is, in a sense, robotic and precise. Because it needs to be. But, as humans, we are different. We can come to our own conclusions. Had Oscar Pistorious been found Not Guilty, there would always have been suspicion surrounding his guilt. There will always be suspicion surrounding JonBenét Ramsey's family... Etc etc.
I will always suspect GT. We can argue this all day and all night. I'm human so I have more opinions based on suspicion than the law.
Hear, Hear Loz ......GT, Oscar and JonBenet.