nightrider17
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2017
- Messages
- 569
- Reaction score
- 4,722
db
‘I also thought he could run straight through there (she points across the road), so he would have run along the road down there.
Police must have thought so too as they also searched his house 3 times in the first 24hrs …I always thought William could have 'gone across the road'. Been taken across there, walked across there, to nocturnal man's house. He was the first person FGM thought of, and he was among the first people that quite a few people here thought of. Quite a few of us right away thought "neighbour".
The position of his property looks right onto the area where William disappeared.
Lots of shrubbery - if someone wanted to stay out of sight and observe.
If JW and PS heard children playing, he likely could have heard children playing.
His property has immediate access to the woods behind that house.
And he took so long to answer the door to the police when they knocked.
(Not to mention the boxlike structure filling his window, and all the oddities about his situation.)
Does he, though? I listened to that a few times and I see the place in the footage where he gestures, but I don't gather that he's saying she was still sitting there when he got home. I think he's indicating where they were sitting when William disappeared, according to what FFC told him when he arrived.And even longer that FGM remained seated on the back patio …. As the FF walkthrough states FGM was still sat there….
JMO = Quite understandable Southaussie that the a neighbour could be responsible for a despicable act.I always thought William could have 'gone across the road'. Been taken across there, walked across there, to nocturnal man's house. He was the first person FGM thought of, and he was among the first people that quite a few people here thought of. Quite a few of us right away thought "neighbour".
The position of his property looks right onto the area where William disappeared.
Lots of shrubbery - if someone wanted to stay out of sight and observe.
If JW and PS heard children playing, he likely could have heard children playing.
His property has immediate access to the woods behind that house.
And he took so long to answer the door to the police when they knocked.
(Not to mention the boxlike structure filling his window, and all the oddities about his situation.)
With no evidence (until maybe something from the most recent search), maybe if the most recent search did not turn up any evidence of William / his body, an accident ...... and LE then decided that disposal of his body can be now be eliminated. So, FFC's drive down Batar Creek Road might well have been to hand him over to someone .... a motive for this could lie in William not fitting in with the Fosters idea of their desired 'son' any longer, and considered him to be 'Government property' .... to be passed on by them. MOO
Below is an extract from your post Nightrider:Post #1191
- Both kids known by the name Tyrrell
- The visit to Kendall was very last minute & depended on wether they could get boarding for their cats, which they got in just in time.
- Had obtained " bulk approval" for travel at times to Kendall as they were travelling frequently when FGF was ill & was easier
- FGF funeral 14/2/2014
- FFC was friendly with ? Miller's from # 52
- Had meet Paul Savage & his wife# 43
- ? crabs # 51
- FFC had not meet Anne Maree Sharpley before the day WT vanished
- Called FGM on way instead of surprising her
- Spoke about broken washing machine on the the thurs night they arrived
- Arrived in Kendall about 9m
- FFC said she remembered the two parked cars on the way back from driving to Port Macquarie airport after picking up a relative & ran straight to the command post to tell the cops. Had FGM & william's sister with her.
I do wonder how thorough the searches of “nocturnal mans” house were on the first day, at that point I’m sure everyone just thought William had wandered off.I always thought William could have 'gone across the road'. Been taken across there, walked across there, to nocturnal man's house. He was the first person FGM thought of, and he was among the first people that quite a few people here thought of. Quite a few of us right away thought "neighbour".
The position of his property looks right onto the area where William disappeared.
Lots of shrubbery - if someone wanted to stay out of sight and observe.
If JW and PS heard children playing, he likely could have heard children playing.
His property has immediate access to the woods behind that house.
And he took so long to answer the door to the police when they knocked.
(Not to mention the boxlike structure filling his window, and all the oddities about his situation.)
Yes they were, and the next day too ….Were residents free to drive off anywhere they liked during the first day?
This is #1421 earlier thread relayed by bearbear
She told the court that William had been “getting very bored” just before he vanished and they were waiting for his foster father to return from the nearby town of Laurieton.
She had been expecting her husband to return from a visit to the chemist and a telephone conference meeting between 10.15am and 10.30am that morning.
“William’s sister was still drawing,” she said.
“He was getting very bored with the game. He was running up and down.
“I said to William (and his sister) ‘you know what? Why don’t we go down and see if Daddy’s car is here yet’.”
William Tyrrell’s foster mum: ‘I beat myself up’
Maybe that's why he was down the front of the yard - because she sent him down there. MOO
I don’t believe the first thoughts were that he had been abducted, hence why so many people turned up to help search for him.If there was a straight forward explanation to Williams disappearance (eg. snatched by an immediate neighbour) then this case would have been solved relatively quickly IMO.
There was a quick and heavy police presence in the immediate vicinity with the narrative along the line that a "3 year old boy had been abducted".
I have followed many cases in the media when children go missing and they are not usually treated as an abduction straight away unless there is a witness.
Why wasn't the first thoughts that he ran off and got lost in the bush?
There is a 3 year old boy that has gone missing today from his baby sitters backyard in Lowell Masachusetts and Police are saying they "suspect nothing more than a missing or lost child".
Police quote "there is nothing to indicate any foul play" and I keep wondering why we were led to immediately suspect foul play in this case without any witnesses or without any evidence to indicate stranger abduction?
"I wasn't watching him and I don't know how long I wasn't watching him but he is gone so someone must have abducted him".
Hmmmm.
Searching separate areas on separate occasions, if that's what happened, doesn't sound like an effective technique.I do wonder how thorough the searches of “nocturnal mans” house were on the first day, at that point I’m sure everyone just thought William had wandered off.
Were residents free to drive off anywhere they liked during the first day?
Which doesn’t really fit with the Fc’s narrative (esp the FFC) that they believed from the beginning it was ”boy taken”, not “boy lost”. Those are the exact words spoken by FFC in where’s William podcast.I don’t believe the first thoughts were that he had been abducted, hence why so many people turned up to help search for him.