sleepinoz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 8,642
- Reaction score
- 25,409
"reasonably satisfied" is not a criminal law standard of proof. It could have been a family law natter, or a guardianship board hearing.
Considering the fact that the allegations were rejected, I would say that "reasonably satisfied" was a criminal law standard of proof for that particular judge.
Yes, it could have been a family law matter or any other court matter including Criminal we don't know, but the fact is these allegations were considered by a judge in a trial/hearing.